Live data from Hacker News

The Atlantic posts sponsored Scientology story, moderates comments

theatlantic.com

31–40 of 261 posts

Re: The Atlantic posts sponsored Scientology story, moderates comments

#31
post #6

UPDATE: Mat Mullen, Disqus employee got a comment past the moderator (maybe he knows someone): This is the weirdest thing I've ever read on the Atlantic. You're actually letting the Church of Scientology sponsor content on your website?

if you go watch the 'upvote' count on his comment, it is flickering rapidly, up two, down one, up one, down two - fascinating.

I think any forum with upvote/downvote needs to have this, so cool to watch.

Re: The Atlantic posts sponsored Scientology story, moderates comments

#32
post #6

UPDATE: Mat Mullen, Disqus employee got a comment past the moderator (maybe he knows someone): This is the weirdest thing I've ever read on the Atlantic. You're actually letting the Church of Scientology sponsor content on your website?

if you go watch the 'upvote' count on his comment, it is flickering rapidly, up two, down one, up one, down two - fascinating.

I don't know understand why its going down? The downvotes should be displayed separately and should not affect the upvotes, unless the upvotes are getting deleted (by somebody or by the upvoters themselves)

Re: The Atlantic posts sponsored Scientology story, moderates comments

#34
post #18

So they're essentially letting Scientology use The Atlantic's "brand" to trick people into reading this? (Yes, I know it says Sponsored Post) This, on top of http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4108929 and http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffbercovici/2012/06/13/reddit-... makes me pretty weary of trusting anything I read on TheAtlantic ever again

You have to wonder what it says about a group that they aren't afraid that their potential converts would find it weird that they need to pay for people to say how awesome they are.

Edit: fixed typo

Re: The Atlantic posts sponsored Scientology story, moderates comments

#35

I understand that this is "sponsoderd content" AKA an ad. I have seen "sponsored pages" in newspapers for many years about a lot of crap, is there a reason to consider this one worse than the average? (Yes, scientology is evil but they are not forbidden from making ads I reckon?) edit: the "sponsored" bit is right on top of the page, as it is in dead-tree-form newspapers too.

When you run sponsored content, you're tying your brand to the brand of the advertiser who you are promoting. This usually isn't a problem, since most outfits will choose to run advertising deals with well-respected brands, and both brands become stronger (and wealthier) because of the association.

In this case, I can't imagine any outcome except for significant brand damage to The Atlantic. They had better have been cut an absolutely toe-curlingly-large check, because I expect they're going to pay for this in credibility loss pretty heavily.

Re: The Atlantic posts sponsored Scientology story, moderates comments

#37

A sample of moderator approved comments: Seems like David Miscavige and Scientology are on a roll. Also it appears the media have been missing the real story. I hadn't realized there were so many new churches opened this past year. Great report!

Finally the true story of scientology is being told!

The true story of scientology has already been told. A mediocre sci-fi author realized he could make a lot of money by inventing a bullshit story [1] and then proceeded to recruit a bunch of brownshirts [2].

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenu [2] http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5055604

And frankly, I think it's high time to kick them the fuck out of Berlin, at the very least. We tried radiating the cancer; it's time to reach for the scalpel.

Re: The Atlantic posts sponsored Scientology story, moderates comments

#38
post #6

UPDATE: Mat Mullen, Disqus employee got a comment past the moderator (maybe he knows someone): This is the weirdest thing I've ever read on the Atlantic. You're actually letting the Church of Scientology sponsor content on your website?

if you go watch the 'upvote' count on his comment, it is flickering rapidly, up two, down one, up one, down two - fascinating.

A few minutes ago his comment had over 600 upvotes. Now it's teetering around 300.. it appears the moderators are also removing upvotes?

Re: The Atlantic posts sponsored Scientology story, moderates comments

#39
post #6

UPDATE: Mat Mullen, Disqus employee got a comment past the moderator (maybe he knows someone): This is the weirdest thing I've ever read on the Atlantic. You're actually letting the Church of Scientology sponsor content on your website?

if you go watch the 'upvote' count on his comment, it is flickering rapidly, up two, down one, up one, down two - fascinating.

You can cause the same thing to happen to any comment by rapidly clicking the upvote button. This seems to cause the upvote count to drift upward, even though you would expect it to just oscillate between two values. I've just taken parkermoseyondown's comment from 0 to 40 upvotes.

Edit: This seems to be a UI issue. After reloading his comment is sitting at only 1 upvote.

Post reply on HN