Earlier quoted context omitted.
God dam I hate the term "man up", it really is a hugely degrading phrase. If someone is having a hard time and asks for the help the worst thing you can do is tell them to "man up" or "get over it".
I would also add "lighten up" and "stop taking things so seriously" to the list of hugely degrading phrases.
Aaron Swartz, Asking For Help, 119 Days Ago
101–110 of 530 posts
Re: Aaron Swartz, Asking For Help, 119 Days Ago
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why is that a contrast? He didn't support what Aaron allegedly did, so he should be happy that Aaron is dead?
> Why is that a contrast? I'm honestly baffled by this question. He didn't just not support what Aaron did, he treated him badly when he requested help and discouraged others from helping. ("man up?" it's difficult to be more contemptuous in so few words.) After reading that original post I wouldn't have called this newer post a contrast. I would have just assumed that his "OH NO" post was an expression of sarcasm fr…
It isn't, please take my word for it. Ed is definitely one of the good guys and mean is an adjective I'd never ever use to refer to him. He's helped countless people here with his insights and care and I'm pretty sure that if he could take that stuff back that he would do so. Words said carelessly can come back to haunt you, the only way to avoid that is to never speak, or to only speak in weasel words. Ed is not very good at weasel words and I consider that a good thing.
Re: Aaron Swartz, Asking For Help, 119 Days Ago
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
Something particularly bugs me about edw519's comments in the thread you linked to and the recent one about the tragedy -- http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5047571 . It's an odd contrast.
I don't seem to have commented on those threads. But if I had, most of my thoughts now are similar to how they were then. Fully in support of his goals. Mixed feelings about his methods. Thinking that civil disobedience gains some of its moral authority from being willing to pay a price. But that the price in this case was completely out of proportion to the violation. Thinking that the feds never should have been in…
"If I had ... been asked ... whether Aaron’s actions were “wrong”, I would probably have replied that what Aaron did would better be described as “inconsiderate”. In the same way it is inconsiderate ... to download lots of files on shared wifi or to spider Wikipedia too quickly, but none of these actions should lead to a young person being hounded for years and haunted by the possibility of a 35 year sentence."
Re: Aaron Swartz, Asking For Help, 119 Days Ago
#104Re: Aaron Swartz, Asking For Help, 119 Days Ago
#105"unable to appeal openly to us for the financial help he needed to fund his defense, at least without risking the ire of a district court judge." Considering the outcome... Does anyone know an example of what judges do when defendants appeal openly for financial help? Was this really good legal advice?
I suspect - but this pure conjecture on my part, IADNAL and so on - that this may have something to do with prejudicing a potential jury. Any jury member that knows about a case before being sworn in is automatically disqualified. Giving potentially nationwide attention to your case by running a funding drive in your name would pollute any potential jury. Again, please don't put too much weight on this, it is purely…
Re: Aaron Swartz, Asking For Help, 119 Days Ago
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would also add "lighten up" and "stop taking things so seriously" to the list of hugely degrading phrases.
It is often difficult to discern between those that will bring excessive drama to any situation and those that are in serious peril.
Even so, these careless and unfounded words must have hurt tremendously, much more so than had nothing been said at all.
Re: Aaron Swartz, Asking For Help, 119 Days Ago
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does anyone here who has paid any attention to Ed whatsoever believe he would have written that comment had he known that Aaron had already been financially ruined by an overzealous prosecution that had confronted him with a dilemma of pleading guilty to 13 felonies and spending 6 months in prison or taking a crap-shot at 6-7 years in prison? NOBODY KNEW THESE DETAILS AT THE TIME. Aaron was apparently prevented from…
No, but he did assume he was asking for funds simply because he wasn't manning up. How many hundreds read/upvoted and made the same assumption? He should've held his judgment, especially with the weight he carries around here. I've been reading his comments for years. I know he's a good guy, but I still think it was a stupid comment to make.
Hindsight is 20/20, and perhaps knowing Aaron was the type who would do something like this would prevent someone from commenting entirely, but it wasn't necessarily a stupid comment to make.
Re: Aaron Swartz, Asking For Help, 119 Days Ago
#108Earlier quoted context omitted.
God dam I hate the term "man up", it really is a hugely degrading phrase. If someone is having a hard time and asks for the help the worst thing you can do is tell them to "man up" or "get over it".
Thank you, not sure I could have phrased it any better. I'm not sure many of us will ever fully understand what Aaron went through, something obviously dark enough that he felt the only way out was to take his own life. If some of the condolences and sympathy on offer right now had been given back then maybe a brilliant mind would still be alive. Hopefully all of us will think twice before dismissing calls of help wi…
Re: Aaron Swartz, Asking For Help, 119 Days Ago
#109I think the takeaway here is to stop assuming you know entirely what is going on and give people the benefit of the doubt. There may be more factors involved than the ones you see; in fact, there always are -- something HN is notorious for not doing (read: AirBnB, Dropbox, etc, etc, etc, etc).
I'm trying very hard to be less of an outspoken opinionated blowhard.
And to admit whenever I've been wrong.
Re: Aaron Swartz, Asking For Help, 119 Days Ago
#110In spite of the way many interest groups are trying to make Aaron's suicide into a symbol, the fact is that suicide is simply a symptom of mental illness, and nothing else.
Unless we have reason to believe otherwise, most of us assume that those whose actions/views we discuss on HN are of normal (average) mental health.
So while Aaron's death is jarring, it's the mental illness that is jarring and not the nuanced view expressed by edw519.
TC must be hurting for clicks/readership these days. I think that story (sadly the current top story on HN) is a new low.