Knowingly having a hacker in an organization is a very difficult predicament. Yes people should be given a second chance, but is it worth all the possible negative press. I would not have kept him on. I don't know the guys though.
Why Mahalo employed a felon hacker
11–20 of 57 posts
Re: Why Mahalo employed a felon hacker
#12The whole story looks like it's been voted down to -2. The low contrast line needs to be drawn somewhere.
Seriously. I'm tired of this. Does anyone know of a Greasemonkey script that can turn all low contrast into black? Calcanis just took years away from my eyes with that color.
I don't find it much of an issue. Maybe your graphics card/monitor's gamma value is too high?
Re: Why Mahalo employed a felon hacker
#13Calacanis' reaction is an interesting one. As he states himself it was the risky, not socially acceptable, decision to make. His telling of the story makes it seem that he made the right decision. I would agree. A little grace, which by definition can only be shown to someone completely unworthy of it, is encouraging. I am fascinated by my own reaction when I read stories like this. Why is it that justice waived produces such a positive response in me? I think it is because my experience shows that I too need grace more often than not. Whether its something as small as being allowed to turn in an assignment late, or a boss who overlooks a broken rule that they had every right to enforce, I need a measure of grace on an almost daily basis. So to Mr. Calacanis: Thank you for reminding us that there is grace out there when we need it.
Re: Why Mahalo employed a felon hacker
#14I'm sad to think that they would have cut him out of the process if they had known.
I sort of hate our culture which demonizes anyone who has ever been prosecuted by the justice system and quickly shuffles them into a corner of "people who we can't legally round up and gas but are just as worthless". It's really unhealthy to think that decent, worthwhile people can't ever make mistakes in judgement (and learn from them!) and to presume that the law is always morally correct. It's really a great disservice to the idea that we are trying to rehabilitate people.
Re: Why Mahalo employed a felon hacker
#15Turning a hiring mistake into linkbait -- you stay classy, JCal.
Ok, that was completely unjustified. How did he turn it into "linkbait"? He has stopped blogging except for the occasional post which he deems enough to re-post to his blog. It seemed like a very insightful entry showing compassion and understanding for others -- something your comment was not.
Oh, please. Jason Calacanis does not need my compassion.
It seemed clear to me that the title was deliberately worded to be provocative. This is a common characteristic of linkbait.
Given Calacanis' past history of search engine spamming, I'm far less forgiving with him than I would be with someone else. Forgive me for "misinterpreting" his intent.
Re: Why Mahalo employed a felon hacker
#16I wonder if he feels differently about point #16 in his famous "How to save money running a startup" ( http://calacanis.com/2008/03/07/how-to-save-money-running-a-... ) from last year:
16) Don’t waste money on recruiters. Get inside of linkedin and Facebook and start looking for people -- it works better anyway.
Re: Why Mahalo employed a felon hacker
#17how can you skip doing a Google search when you are employing someone?
The only reason is because it was 1997 when they hired him
Re: Why Mahalo employed a felon hacker
#18I know 'innocent until proven guilty' and all that, but I'm still pretty surprised that a judge would allow someone who is about to go on trial for computer fraud and hacking find work at a computer company and use the internet.
Re: Why Mahalo employed a felon hacker
#19The whole story looks like it's been voted down to -2. The low contrast line needs to be drawn somewhere.
Seriously. I'm tired of this. Does anyone know of a Greasemonkey script that can turn all low contrast into black? Calcanis just took years away from my eyes with that color.
Readability: http://lab.arc90.com/2009/03/readability.php
Re: Why Mahalo employed a felon hacker
#20There are things that I don't understand about this story.
I don't understand why Calacanis' choice was between firing his trusted CTO and retaining a convicted computer felon.
I don't understand how Mahalo could have checked any reference, let alone 3-5, and not found out that Schiefer is one of the most famous computer felons in California.
I don't understand why Calacanis is characterizing something that Schiefer did in 2005, in his mid-20's, as the actions of a "stupid kid".
I don't understand how Calacanis arrives at his estimation that Schiefer did only 0.0000001% of the damage he could have with his botnet. Schiefer stole random Paypal accounts and used them to buy things, and passed stolen Paypal accounts on to his acquaintances. What's the "worse" thing you can do with a botnet? At least the DDoS extortion botnets target gambling sites, and not your mom.
For that matter, I don't understand how Calacanis can equate what Schiefer did to the dumb things lots of teenagers do on computer networks (and, for that matter, on conference room floors). Schiefer wasn't a "hacker". He's a carder.
(As a side-note to Calacanis: sniffing people's passwords at conferences? Also illegal!)
Calacanis says Schiefer was supervised in his work at Mahalo. Is there someone who isn't supervised there? I don't understand how Mahalo believes they had the capability to supervise someone who can manage a 250,000-host botnet.
Unfortunately, I do understand why Calacanis thinks he doesn't handle sensitive information. He doesn't see the link between tens of thousands of email-password pairs and those people's bank accounts. Just a wild guess, but I'm thinking the guy who steals the Paypal accounts out of bot-infected Windows boxes can make that leap.
This is just such a weird post. I guess I can understand not seeing "contrition". But Calacanis seems proud that this happened. It's just head-explody weird.