Live data from Hacker News

Monoprice Announces 27-Inch 2560 x 1440 Monitor for $390

tested.com

61–70 of 167 posts

Re: Monoprice Announces 27-Inch 2560 x 1440 Monitor for $390

#61
These look the same as these no-brand korean monitors I got off ebay for $334. It's a great monitor. I've been using two of them for months.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/New-FIRST-FSM-270YG-27-LED-2560x1440...

There's a blog post about them here:

http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2012/07/the-ips-lcd-revolut...

Re: Monoprice Announces 27-Inch 2560 x 1440 Monitor for $390

#62

I have a Crossover 27Q (similar to this, probably sourced from the same place as other brands on ebay: Catleap, Shimian, wherever Monoprice is getting them, etc). Gorgeous minimalist metallic shell. Swivel display. Adjustable height. $375 from Ebay. Pixel perfect. I can't exaggerate how amazing these displays are. They're the same LG panels used in Apple Cinema displays at nearly a third of the cost. It's wonderful t…

If I can ask a few questions: 1) Are Ebay/alibaba retailers trustworthy? I'd hate to be shipped a lemon (assuming they even ship outside the US). 2) Why must it be DisplayPort? Doesn't it support HDMI/DVI?

  >> Are Ebay/alibaba retailers trustworthy?
I have had very good results buying from sellers with >99% rating. I have had fairly poor results with sellers having 98% rating or lower.

I think that most people don't give bad reviews even after a bad experience. You might expect a bad experience once out of 50 times with a seller having a 98% rating, but I have found it to happen much, much more often.

Re: Monoprice Announces 27-Inch 2560 x 1440 Monitor for $390

#63
In case anyone doesn't know... Monoprice is an incredible site with high-quality, budget products and really good customer service. The fact that these cheap monitors are now backed by a company I trust makes a big difference. (Don't work for them... just a satisfied customer).

Re: Monoprice Announces 27-Inch 2560 x 1440 Monitor for $390

#64
post #57

Dear display industry, Please please please increase vertical resolution. I look back on the days of 16:10 fondly and wish we could end up back there or better.

Get the Asus PA248Q. It's a calibrated IPS monitor, 24" 1920x1200 (i.e. 16:10). I have one and it's great.

I have both an HP LP2475w (24" 1920x1200, IPS) and a 27" 2560x1440 monitor--the same resolution as mentioned here. (I didn't want to deal with potential dead pixels and scaling issues, so I forked over the $700 for the Asus PB278Q instead of buying the off-brand.)

Honestly, I hate using my HP now. It's a great monitor, but the 2560x1440 resolution on the Asus is amazing. Side by side, the Asus knocks the HP out of the park.

TLDR: It is not worth the downgrade in screen size and resolution just to get a 16x10 aspect ratio. You will never regret going for the 2560x1440 monitor instead.

Re: Monoprice Announces 27-Inch 2560 x 1440 Monitor for $390

#65

Dear display industry, Please please please increase vertical resolution. I look back on the days of 16:10 fondly and wish we could end up back there or better.

16:9 is a lot more tolerable when the "short" side is still 1440px tall. The aspect ratio makes a lot more sense at a 27" size than it does in a 13" laptop.

Sure, I'd prefer 2560x1600 than 2560x1440, but it really isn't a big deal.

Re: Monoprice Announces 27-Inch 2560 x 1440 Monitor for $390

#66
post #57

Dear display industry, Please please please increase vertical resolution. I look back on the days of 16:10 fondly and wish we could end up back there or better.

Get the Asus PA248Q. It's a calibrated IPS monitor, 24" 1920x1200 (i.e. 16:10). I have one and it's great.

I really like 16:10, not sure why 16:9 is so much more common.

Re: Monoprice Announces 27-Inch 2560 x 1440 Monitor for $390

#67
post #46

What I'd be curious about is when PC laptops with equivalent resolution are going to arrive?

High-DPI doesn't work in Windows (officially it does work, but if you try it you'll find that every app is broken), so that's effectively an unsellable product.

What do you mean by 'broken'? Can you point to an example image?

Re: Monoprice Announces 27-Inch 2560 x 1440 Monitor for $390

#68

Am I the only one who would rather see more work around thinner bezels for better multi-mon experiences? Seeems like all the large panels have at least an inch to inch and a half bezel space; two next to each other and the non-lit area get obstructive.

I personally prefer a big screen over multiple screens, if only for the ability to place windows anywhere I want on my screen real estate. Bezel space is thus secondary for me.

Re: Monoprice Announces 27-Inch 2560 x 1440 Monitor for $390

#69
post #27

From Monoprice on the warranty: "we are guaranteeing these monitor will have less than 5 dead pixels. [...] By comparison, the industry standard, even for industry leaders like Apple and LG, is 10 dead pixels or even more." Is this true? None of my Apple devices have ever had a dead pixel, but I always assumed that even one dead pixel would be enough to convince the Genius Bar to give me a replacement. Anyone have fi…

They're probably all LG panels under the hood[1]. Different resellers have different pixel policies, and they can be a bit hard to keep track of. On these size screens, Apple won't replace And in practice, if you complain well enough in the store, Apple may replace for you even if you're under the line. [1] When I say "they", I mean these 27" IPS panels, whether they're from Apple, Dell, HP, or some random Korean com…

For what it's worth, Apple replaced my Retina iPad that had a single stuck pixel, and it was only noticeable on a dark background in a dark room. While it's a small screen, the number of pixels is about the same as on the 27" Cinema display.

What their official policies say and what they actually do are pretty different, it seems.

Re: Monoprice Announces 27-Inch 2560 x 1440 Monitor for $390

#70
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

1. I bought mine from green-sum on Ebay, no problems and his feedback is pretty spotless. 2. the Catleap range takes Dual-link DVI, which requires the powered adapter for (I use Apple's one for the MBP, and bought an extra minidisplayport -> displayport adapter for my work laptop).

So will a cheap mini displayport -> DVI adapter like this: http://www.monoprice.com/products/product.asp?c_id=104&c... not work for one of these displays, coupled with a Macbook Air (2012)?

That will not work. You, unfortunately, need the expensive USB powered/assisted adapter. (I have both. Had to buy the other to drive the high resolution.)
Post reply on HN