21–30 of 52 posts
is this the dutch version of billmonk?
1) The top screenshots coming into foreground is a nice touch, but something seems choppy about the animation. I think it's less to do with the currently hovered image, but what happens to the previous image you had selected. It seems to just drop away in one frame, which looks awkward. Maybe moving it to background instantly, but putting a delay to slide back down would be better; it's difficult to visualize though.
2) Nobody really clicks through carousels anymore, and waiting for them to move automatically is irritating. Not sure what would be better, but consider something else if that information is important.
3) The sticky header at the top is not my favorite thing, and this may just be personal preference. I will actually close a website that does that to me. I may be alone here.
Locks up Firefox 18 with a "busy script" warning.
Non designer here. I like the overall design, but I do have a few things I'd personally change (nit picky, might not change my desire to click through): 1) The top screenshots coming into foreground is a nice touch, but something seems choppy about the animation. I think it's less to do with the currently hovered image, but what happens to the previous image you had selected. It seems to just drop away in one frame,…
Is there a data point to back up this statement? I know I definitely do click through carousels, if I'm intrigued enough about what might be there.
The pricing table seems a little silly, since most of the points are similar across all three price levels... It's a table for the table's sake, I guess.
Also, I personally think the pricing is fairly steep for what you're offering. I actually have an eenmansbedrijf and I spend very little time per year doing invoicing and taxes, let alone per month. Maybe you need different price differentiation, i.e. make it cheap for < 20 invoices / year. That would actually let me ease into it.
(I can read it; and, I also like the anchors in the main nav.) The pricing table seems a little silly, since most of the points are similar across all three price levels... It's a table for the table's sake, I guess. Also, I personally think the pricing is fairly steep for what you're offering. I actually have an eenmansbedrijf and I spend very little time per year doing invoicing and taxes, let alone per month. Mayb…
(I can read it; and, I also like the anchors in the main nav.) The pricing table seems a little silly, since most of the points are similar across all three price levels... It's a table for the table's sake, I guess. Also, I personally think the pricing is fairly steep for what you're offering. I actually have an eenmansbedrijf and I spend very little time per year doing invoicing and taxes, let alone per month. Mayb…
The pricing is based on the length of the term that you want to pre-pay. If you pay monthly it's going to be be €19, if you pay yearly it's €190 - saving you 2 months of fees, if you pay for 2 years its €342 - saving you 6 months of fees. It's a standard pricing paradigm, but I do agree that this specific table doesn't really highlight the fact that it's the same PLAN for each price point. They should lay out this in…
I don't like such an experience. This is exactly why I don't differentiate in functionality, but only in price based on the commitment. Our target customers are freelancers, our companies with at most two employees.
We only have one plan: THE AWESOME PLAN. Depending on how long you're willing to commit, you get a discount. I agree the table could point that out a little bit better.
Non designer here. I like the overall design, but I do have a few things I'd personally change (nit picky, might not change my desire to click through): 1) The top screenshots coming into foreground is a nice touch, but something seems choppy about the animation. I think it's less to do with the currently hovered image, but what happens to the previous image you had selected. It seems to just drop away in one frame,…
> Nobody really clicks through carousels anymore Is there a data point to back up this statement? I know I definitely do click through carousels, if I'm intrigued enough about what might be there.
Of course you click through if you're intrigued enough. I'm not sure carousels are meant to create intrigue about a product. I'm not really sure what their purpose is. Every carousel I've seen has been probably better off being displayed all at once rather than one at a time. This is the Internet, many people (barring disabled/elderly users, who shouldn't be ignored) are used to consuming a lot of data simultaneously, most don't want it fed through a tiny straw.
I see them as a design fad that are typically asked for because someone's friend/competitor has one, or "ooh, ahh" 'ed at by clients who didn't know animation on web pages was possible.
Non designer here. I like the overall design, but I do have a few things I'd personally change (nit picky, might not change my desire to click through): 1) The top screenshots coming into foreground is a nice touch, but something seems choppy about the animation. I think it's less to do with the currently hovered image, but what happens to the previous image you had selected. It seems to just drop away in one frame,…
> Nobody really clicks through carousels anymore Is there a data point to back up this statement? I know I definitely do click through carousels, if I'm intrigued enough about what might be there.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Nobody really clicks through carousels anymore Is there a data point to back up this statement? I know I definitely do click through carousels, if I'm intrigued enough about what might be there.
In my humble opinion, I put them on par with pagination of articles (not good). Of course you click through if you're intrigued enough . I'm not sure carousels are meant to create intrigue about a product. I'm not really sure what their purpose is. Every carousel I've seen has been probably better off being displayed all at once rather than one at a time. This is the Internet, many people (barring disabled/elderly us…