Live data from Hacker News

How To Make Trillions Of Dollars

thoughtcatalog.com

101–110 of 144 posts

Re: How To Make Trillions Of Dollars

#101
Very good article ! I am genuinely surprised that HN's positively reacts to blog posts like this while massively reacting against ad blocking initiatives. For example this HN news thread: France’s second-largest ISP deploys ad blocking via firmware update [1].

Can someone that like this article and dislike [1] explain me.

[1] http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5004621

Re: How To Make Trillions Of Dollars

#102

Very good article ! I am genuinely surprised that HN's positively reacts to blog posts like this while massively reacting against ad blocking initiatives. For example this HN news thread: France’s second-largest ISP deploys ad blocking via firmware update [1]. Can someone that like this article and dislike [1] explain me. [1] http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5004621

As much as it burns my nose hairs to admit this ... HN is not a hivemind.

Different people will react to different things.

Re: How To Make Trillions Of Dollars

#103

Very good article ! I am genuinely surprised that HN's positively reacts to blog posts like this while massively reacting against ad blocking initiatives. For example this HN news thread: France’s second-largest ISP deploys ad blocking via firmware update [1]. Can someone that like this article and dislike [1] explain me. [1] http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5004621

As much as it burns my nose hairs to admit this ... HN is not a hivemind. Different people will react to different things.

I agree with this, but I have the feeling that some people have mixed feelings regarding this problem. Hence my (rather precise) question: Can someone that like this article AND dislike [1] explain me.

Re: How To Make Trillions Of Dollars

#104

Note that people who are outside the American madhouse, those who live in developing countries like the Philippines or China, very much want to adopt American customs. Few of them want to live a monastic or back-to-nature lifestyle. These people can learn from Americans' experience, yet there is no mass movement to adopt the good part while staying relaxed, centered, and happy. I'm not saying that they prefer employe…

And why is that? Where I live most of the year, on a mountain in nature, I see young people moving away all the time and their parents and grandparents wanting 'something better' for them. What is that something better? If you ask them, they all, without fail, come with examples from American tv shows on how they want to live or how they want their offspring to live. Nice suits, phones, cars, houses, etc. Why do people living of fantastic fresh fish, veg, olive(s) oil, cheese and people who saw their parents/grandparents walk up the mountain every day to get groceries or work the land so desperately want to grow incredibly fat on Burger King and have as highest goal to 'not do anything every again'?

I know they want this because they see it in tv shows because they tell me; it's considered 'being rich' to act and look like that. People who are complaining all the time to us that they cannot possibly pay the next month rent have huge flatscreens and DID buy another game console or phone with christmas. I don't know about the Philipines or China, but this is southern europe and it's very real. I think it's more or less the same there; you see people 'having fun' (it's a sitcom yo!) and believe that kind of wealth is something to go for.

I'm not saying we have to go back to nature; internet, mobile devices etc is fine. But to think that 2 SUVs, a huge house (what's on the top floor again? yeah no-one goes there ever) or two, almost certainly living on debt (it's one of those things designed to buy perceived happiness in exchange for money for the MAN) will make you happy is a delusion which is set forth by the media. If media for some reason would not put some much positive weight in consumerism, a lot of people here would be content doing what their parents/grandparents did. Now they are not; they have a hardpush drive to 'get what Americans take for granted' without really knowing why they want that.

Re: How To Make Trillions Of Dollars

#106

Note that people who are outside the American madhouse, those who live in developing countries like the Philippines or China, very much want to adopt American customs. Few of them want to live a monastic or back-to-nature lifestyle. These people can learn from Americans' experience, yet there is no mass movement to adopt the good part while staying relaxed, centered, and happy. I'm not saying that they prefer employe…

And why is that? Where I live most of the year, on a mountain in nature, I see young people moving away all the time and their parents and grandparents wanting 'something better' for them. What is that something better? If you ask them, they all, without fail, come with examples from American tv shows on how they want to live or how they want their offspring to live. Nice suits, phones, cars, houses, etc. Why do peop…

Everything you're saying is true. But note that these people have had the opportunity to learn of the harmful effects of consumerism -- even if they watch TV shows, there are other sources of information that tell them the truth. Is everyone that stupid?

Re: How To Make Trillions Of Dollars

#107

Very good article ! I am genuinely surprised that HN's positively reacts to blog posts like this while massively reacting against ad blocking initiatives. For example this HN news thread: France’s second-largest ISP deploys ad blocking via firmware update [1]. Can someone that like this article and dislike [1] explain me. [1] http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5004621

I am perfectly okay with adblocking, and run a very aggressive adblocker as well as requestpolicy and a click-to-play plugin blocker. That said, I really do not want my ISP to be making these decisions for me.

Re: How To Make Trillions Of Dollars

#108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As much as it burns my nose hairs to admit this ... HN is not a hivemind. Different people will react to different things.

I agree with this, but I have the feeling that some people have mixed feelings regarding this problem. Hence my (rather precise) question: Can someone that like this article AND dislike [1] explain me.

Well, I agree with almost everything in this article that the system is designed to keep people unhappy & unhealthy, so that they're constantly buying things to rid themselves of both issues.

At the same time, I will never accept the idea of internet-content being filtered at the ISP level. I want 100% of the web-content to reach my computer. There, I will make the decision of what I want to see.

Re: How To Make Trillions Of Dollars

#109
post #40

Happiness, health and stability are not core objectives of our society. The production of wealth, as measured by GDP, or by the stock markets, or consumer spending, is our yardstick of success. I hope that in the remainder of the century we can can transition to better forms of society where the health and happiness of the general population is more important than the efficiency of our economic structures.

True, but that can only work if it happens naturally.

If you force me to be happy, I will be very sad.

Re: How To Make Trillions Of Dollars

#110
post #83

It's amazing to me how much expense comes out of fear. For example, one of the reasons why Manhattan real estate is so expensive is that people feel a need to live here in order to keep up their professional status. Not to limit their commutes, but because the really evil law and financial firms stop promoting you as soon as you move off the island. So they spend $5 million on a house, as opposed to, for example, not…

Are you just making this up as you go? You're completely wrong. Getting in/out of Manhattan is painful from just about anywhere. It's usually a minimum of hour door to door. If you're working 10-12hr days, you'll pay for the easy subway commute. However, there are plenty of very successful people that do commute from NJ, CT, and Westchester. The solution to expensive Manhattan real estate is better mass transit. Imag…

There's no doubt that the commute is hellish, but the people who can afford to buy housing in Manhattan are not working 10+ hour days. The IBD analysts and associates are bidding up rents, for sure, but price-rent ratios are ridiculous (35+ years) and they have no part in that.

The solution to expensive Manhattan real estate is better mass transit.

That would be a huge win.

Post reply on HN