Live data from Hacker News

Survey says Facebook still in use by young, but Snapchat/Instagram are real

blog.garrytan.com

31–40 of 56 posts

Re: Survey says Facebook still in use by young, but Snapchat/Instagram are real

#31
post #2

Anecdotal evidence: I had never messed with Instragram until I got a girlfriend whose peer group used that exclusively over Facebook. These are all in the 28-32 age range. It seems they were all eager to use a system that just focused on sharing photos and didn't want all the 'bloat' associated with Facebook. In addition to preferring the focus on photosharing, there was a sense of just wanting to be back on a networ…

It is amusing that there's less friction to move to a new network than to clean up the old one. Unfriending (or hiding/muting/whatever while still actively using Facebook) is much more likely to be taken as an affront by your long-time Facebook friends than simply stopping using FB much. But eventually it seems like the same people will move to the new network of choice, and try to contact you there, and you've got t…

I've had an instagram since it started and have watched friends slowly adopt. It really seemed to be catching fire in the past 3 months.

So in my experience I've found that people follow me but because the tool doesn't very easily show if someone follows you back, without digging back and forth through your followers, it's very easy to just unfollow the friends who don't provide content I care about.

It's more similar to Twitters model of pub/sub vs facebooks 1 to 1 dynamic. If I 'defriend' on facebook it forces you to defriend both ways right? I think facebook has made attempts at fixing this with subscriptions but ...

Re: Survey says Facebook still in use by young, but Snapchat/Instagram are real

#34

1,000 people is a very small sample...

Not true, at least if the sample is truly random.

It gives a confidence interval of plus or minus 3% (regardless of the size of population being surveyed!)

http://www.publicagenda.org/pages/best-estimates-guide-sampl...

For example, if 50 percent of a sample of 1,000 randomly selected Americans said they favor recycling laws, in 95 cases out of 100, 50 percent of the entire population in the U.S. would also have given the same response had they been asked, give or take 3 percentage points (i.e., the true proportion could be 47 percent or 53 percent). The bigger the sample, the smaller the margin of error, but once you get past a certain point -- say, a sample size of 800 or 1,000 — the improvement is very small.

Re: Survey says Facebook still in use by young, but Snapchat/Instagram are real

#36
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That would be kind of cool, actually. A $5 one-time fee for every user. It would keep out the riff-raff and spammers, and there would be no need to sell user content or even have ads at all.

A 5$ one-time fee is way too low. Advertisers will probably outspend anything that isn't a proper monthly subscription.

Isn't that approximately what Facebook makes per user, per year in advertising?

Re: Survey says Facebook still in use by young, but Snapchat/Instagram are real

#37

I would be hesitant to wonder about the data on Snapchat and what it provides. Think of how the app works: You take a picture, add a caption, and draw on the picture if you please. Then you select friends to send it to and you're done. That can be accomplished in < 30 seconds. Viewing snaps sent from friends is at MAX 10 seconds per snap. Unless a user is sending and receiving a lot of snaps, I would doubt they reach…

Thinly veiled, Snapchat is for sending nudes. In that sense I suppose it's more incentive to send photos, given the premise that the photos won't be seen by a third party.

Re: Survey says Facebook still in use by young, but Snapchat/Instagram are real

#40
post #36
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A 5$ one-time fee is way too low. Advertisers will probably outspend anything that isn't a proper monthly subscription.

Isn't that approximately what Facebook makes per user, per year in advertising?

That must be the profit margin. $5 isn't enough to cover costs and living I think.
Post reply on HN