Live data from Hacker News

The problem with open source

blog.arsalanbashir.com

1–10 of 16 posts

Re: The problem with open source

#2
"Open source software is not made for average users. Everything from the interface to the installation procedures on most open source software is designed under the assumption that the end user is familiar with CMD/Terminal commands and bizarre user interface"

False. This article seems to just be spreading FUD about open source.

Re: The problem with open source

#3

  (This post was typed on Emacs, an open source text editor, 
  and I’m already gathering awkward looks from the people. 
  “A strangely dressed man typing away furiously into a black 
  screen with green text. He’s got to be a hacker!”)
More likely people are thinking "Why is he using Emacs when he could be using VIM!?". Or maybe they're asking why he's writing a blog entry on an OS like Emacs when it doesn't have a good text editor.

Seriously though, most of the software I use is open source and is often more user friendly than commercial alternatives. So I disagree pretty strongly.

Re: The problem with open source

#4
post #2

"Open source software is not made for average users. Everything from the interface to the installation procedures on most open source software is designed under the assumption that the end user is familiar with CMD/Terminal commands and bizarre user interface" False. This article seems to just be spreading FUD about open source.

My personal anecdotical evidence suggests otherwise.

I believe that in order to get the general audience interested in open source it will need a better branding and design. Note, that some organizations are taking steps towards this direction (Ubuntu and Mozilla come to my mind).

Interestingly, I use a lot of open source projects that do not have gui nor complicated UI. I can't say the same thing about projects that do have a gui…

Re: The problem with open source

#5
tl;dr: guy talks about circumventing software in order to "get the job done". He does this on a blog whose styles where lifted from my own, distinctly not open source blog. So yeah, I guess that's a thing.

Re: The problem with open source

#7
Seems like a flamebait post, skip it and you won't miss anything.

I will join the others in pointing out some of its bullshit. I did not fully read it, this caught my eye:

If you’re a part of the core “design” team of GIMP, the first thing you could do is getting rid of that logo.

My point being, an Otocyon holding a paintbrush simply cannot go up against a seven-hundred-dollars-a-piece software.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GIMP#Mascot vs (I guess) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Adobe_Photoshop_CS6_icon.s... ? The PS logo looks like it was made by a undergrad amateur!

Also I do not see GIMP in any need to "go up against" commercial competitors. It is a nice and complex program. I use it for years and I like it. Photoshop confuses me to no end and I am incapable of the smallest tasks without asking or reading guides. There are also great alternatives to GIMP which many people seem to ignore. It seems trendy to hit on GIMP without knowing better. I suggest checking out Krita, MyPaint, RawTherapee, Darktable, GIMP Paint Studio for alternatives depending on the use case.

Re: The problem with open source

#8
post #5

tl;dr: guy talks about circumventing software in order to "get the job done". He does this on a blog whose styles where lifted from my own, distinctly not open source blog. So yeah, I guess that's a thing.

saw that, was just about to give you heads up on twitter but glad you've seen it.

Re: The problem with open source

#9
post #5

tl;dr: guy talks about circumventing software in order to "get the job done". He does this on a blog whose styles where lifted from my own, distinctly not open source blog. So yeah, I guess that's a thing.

Heh, awkward. - Hadn't seen your site's ?recent? makeover, looks nice! Also, his page suggests he's a 'Developer at Github'?

Re: The problem with open source

#10
post #7

Seems like a flamebait post, skip it and you won't miss anything. I will join the others in pointing out some of its bullshit. I did not fully read it, this caught my eye: If you’re a part of the core “design” team of GIMP, the first thing you could do is getting rid of that logo. My point being, an Otocyon holding a paintbrush simply cannot go up against a seven-hundred-dollars-a-piece software. http://en.wikipedia.…

Linux and Zed Shaw have the best rants. All the others are disappointing :P
Post reply on HN