Live data from Hacker News

What one book could give me a new, useful superpower?

ask.metafilter.com

311–316 of 316 posts

Re: What one book could give me a new, useful superpower?

#311

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree that it is very important to understand the context and history behind awful events. But the concept of "evil" is still very useful. The point of defining evil is so that you can teach people not to be evil. Humans may not have a "conscience" that comes from God, but our brains have evolved for a sense of conscience that can be cultivated via the social pressure of parents, family, friends, teachers, and lead…

> But the concept of "evil" is still very useful. The point of defining evil is so that you can teach people not to be evil. > But the rise of Hitler was not inevitable. Had Hitler been raised with a stronger, better moral compass, had the people who enabled his rise possessed a better moral compass, the war and the Holocaust would not have happened. Things could have happened differently, but the war was more or les…

Things could have happened differently, but the war was more or less unavoidable due to the Versaille treaty.

Had the Versailles treaty actually been enforced, had the winning powers actually declared war on Germany early in the 1930's when Germany violated the treaty, and before Germany had significantly rearmed, Hitler would have been quickly defeated.

Hilter was just one man -- millions of Germans wanted "war" and were enraged with the treaty even before Hitler became known.

Yes, but Hitler was a genius at using that hate and at giving the Germans a renewed sense of their latent power. The desire to rearm and invade eastern europe to steel their land was the great brainchild of Hitler, no other German leaders at the time had anything close Hitler's level of megalomania.

What? This is extremely condescending to the German people.

To be clear, it was not just Americans who rebuilt the education system. It was the Americans in conjunction with the leaders of the German resistance (who were now promoted into power) and the general population who were disillusioned with war. The prestige of victory is such that the Americans did need to use all that repressive methods to wipe out Nazi ideology.

You really believe that they needed ...Americans to instill a "moral system" onto them?!!!

Well, the Germans sure did not do it themselves in the 1930's before the American occupation! Germans had an ethical system then, but it was the ethics of Jenger's Storm of Steel - "Time only strengthens my conviction that it was a good and strenuous life, and that the war, for all its destructiveness, was an incomparable schooling of the heart..". The American victory taught Germans that the way of evil conquest was not an acceptable path, that it led only to ruin. The Nuremberg trials, the new German constitution, de-Nazification, a rebuilt education systen, etc, all ensured that German morals would be much more pacifist in the future.

As if Americans are ...morally superior people?!!!

The Americans of 1940 were morally superior to the Germans of 1940. Is there really any argument about this? Now, whether the Americans of 1835 were more moral than the Germans of 1940 is a different question. (It is striking how similar the concept of Lebensraum is to the concept of Manifest Destiny)

Re: What one book could give me a new, useful superpower?

#312
post #212

"How to win friends and influence people" has blessed everyone I know who has read it with the power of BEING A MASSIVE PRICK. Since that isn't the kind of super power we want, I'd suggest "Power Reading". Being able to read faster than anyone you know will pay off in dividends (provided you never tell anyone that you read an entire novel during your lunch break)...

"How to win friends and influence people"'s main point is to genuinely care about the people you interact with. Hard to see how that translates into "being a massive prick". I'm curious what led you to that conclusion about the book.

Re: What one book could give me a new, useful superpower?

#313

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Evil being subjective, my answer is "fuck yeah". Stalin and him were full of it.

Evil is a BS theological notion. I wish people would stop perpetuating it. People act. Sometimes they do things that hurt other people. But they are not "evil". Including serial killers: they can be mentally ill (physiologically), or have severe psychological problems because of childhood abuse and such. Hitler, for example, was the elected leader of a huge country, with a grassroots following for years. Millions of…

[deleted]

Re: What one book could give me a new, useful superpower?

#314
post #123

I was looking through these titles rather cynically, and wondering if it would be pretentious of me to recommend The Teachings of the Compassionate Buddha or the Discourses of Epictetus, and then I saw it: The Inner Game of Tennis , by Timothy Gallwey Yes... yes! I'll gladly recommend this over any book of philosophy. (Different philosophers click with different people.) Granted, I was thirteen and a tennis player wh…

Having gone though Epictetus's Enchiridion several times, it's certainly something you have to pick through. There is a balance between emotions and objectivity that is lost in stoicism.

Re: What one book could give me a new, useful superpower?

#315
post #292

Earlier quoted context omitted.

VAK(T): Visual, Auditory, Kinesthetic, (Tactile). It's been argued that tactile and kinesthetic learners can be lumped into the same group, hence the parentheses. It's also hard to define exactly what the differences between the two are.

[this is a digression on learning styles] Ah. The VAK model. I looked briefly for scientific support for this "theory" on the Internet, but I couldn't really find any. Wikipedia suggested it's a theory with little to no support, and other locations didn't show ANYTHING that would convince me such a thing as "visual" or "auditory" learners exist. Below is a bit of my thinking on the subject. I am inclined to think tha…

[deleted]

Re: What one book could give me a new, useful superpower?

#316

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Free software never dies.

It's important for budding programmers to build confidence in themselves. Forcing them to work with other programmers at the very beginning destroys confidence and makes them hate the work.

> Forcing them to work with other programmers at the very beginning destroys confidence and makes them hate the work.

In a Free Software project, nobody forces you to cooperate with anyone. If you want, you can just release your program (or patch) and ignore all feedback. However, often enough you'll receive some very valuable feedback.

Also, you'll receive different kind of feedback depending on whether you start your own Free Software project, or contribute to an existing one. So I suggest to do both.

Post reply on HN