Before we start with the standard junk about "imperial measures are better because they are easier to understand / better suited to human scale / etc." can I say nope . The only advantage that imperial measures have (for some) is that they are familiar. That's the sum total of it. People where were raised metric find these apologies for imperial measures to be pure gibberish.
You think there are no advantages to easy divisibility? 16 is divisible by 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16. 24 is divisible by 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 10 just has 1, 2, 5, 10
Make the Metric system the standard in the United States
251–260 of 547 posts
Re: Make the Metric system the standard in the United States
#252It's obviously a great idea, and obviously (to Americans) unlikely to happen in the lifetime of anybody reading this forum. Does anybody else from America remember being taught the metric system in public elementary school, and being told that we'd be switching to it over the next few years? I was taught this around second grade (1981), I think based on the Metric Conversion Act of 1975 ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki…
Amusing visual evidence that speaking English sucks: http://cnrsociety.org/images/English-Official_Map-s.png
The metric system graphic indicates <1/6 of the world's population highlighted as not using the metric system, making gp's point stronger.
Re: Make the Metric system the standard in the United States
#253Before we start with the standard junk about "imperial measures are better because they are easier to understand / better suited to human scale / etc." can I say nope . The only advantage that imperial measures have (for some) is that they are familiar. That's the sum total of it. People where were raised metric find these apologies for imperial measures to be pure gibberish.
You think there are no advantages to easy divisibility? 16 is divisible by 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16. 24 is divisible by 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 10 just has 1, 2, 5, 10
Re: Make the Metric system the standard in the United States
#254It very likely is never going to happen. The main reason for resistance apparently is the various land boundaries that would have to be re-scaled to metric, which would be a source of endless legal wrangling. Already houses in the US have the longest history attached to them, sometimes all the way from the homesteading days if the plot is old. I've used both metric and imperial, for construction imperial is lots easi…
I was reviewing some old deeds that a relative had. A particular inclusion of land was expanded (they transferred some land to expand a township cemetery). The deed before the transfer is specified relative to survey markers and such. The deed after the transfer gives the corners as lat/long coordinates. I guess there is some room to argue about the representational accuracy of a chosen coordinate system, but it woul…
Re: Make the Metric system the standard in the United States
#255It's obviously a great idea, and obviously (to Americans) unlikely to happen in the lifetime of anybody reading this forum. Does anybody else from America remember being taught the metric system in public elementary school, and being told that we'd be switching to it over the next few years? I was taught this around second grade (1981), I think based on the Metric Conversion Act of 1975 ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki…
Re: Make the Metric system the standard in the United States
#256Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sorry, but how is that picture evidence that the US system sucks? I don't disagree that we have a poor system, but "everyone else is doing it" has never been a justification to do anything!
If everyone else was using tcp/ip would it be sensible to continue using ipx/spx?
Re: Make the Metric system the standard in the United States
#257ISO 216 paper sizes while you're at it, please!
Re: Make the Metric system the standard in the United States
#258Earlier quoted context omitted.
To be honest, although I know the obvious benefits of metric, I still prefer imperial simply because of its messiness. I realize the system is archaic, etc., but I still like that connection, as attenuated as it may be, to our ancient past. Use metric for all scientific purposes, etc., but keep that connection to the natural world. I suppose I like it in the same way I prefer natural languages to some artificial lang…
In the year MMXIII is sentiment really a good reason to continue using an inefficient system :)
Re: Make the Metric system the standard in the United States
#259From the petitions.whitehouse.gov petition kindly submitted for comment here: "The United States is one of the few countries left in the world who still have not converted to using the Metric System as a standardized system of measurement. Instead of going along with what the rest of the world uses, we stubbornly still adhere to using the imprecise Imperial Unit - despite the fact that practically every other country…
Yes, in theory the US is a country that supports metric. In practice, go and ask anybody in the country outside of the military for the following:
- An M10 bolt
- a 16mm wrench to drive it with
- a 3 meter long 50 mm od pvc drainpipe
- a tape-measure that measures only in metric
- a highway sign that is posted in km
And so on. See how many people can point you to any of these.
Then try this:
- a 3/8th " bolt
- a 9/16th " wrench to drive it with
- a 10' long 2" od pvc drainpipe
- a tape measure that only measures in Imperial
- a highway sign posted in Miles.
The petition is dead on in the way the US approaches the metric system, in practice it is imperial all the way. As long as the practice doesn't change what the technical situation is won't matter one bit.
The only way to get out of this is to change the law, and to deprecate Imperial in favor of metric.
Re: Make the Metric system the standard in the United States
#260Earlier quoted context omitted.
We should all have one currency too, then?
Of course not: sovereign currencies have well-known benefits. Multiple systems of measurement are only a hindrance, a friction.