Live data from Hacker News

Trap street

en.wikipedia.org

11–20 of 23 posts

Re: Trap street

#11
post #4

Google Maps directed me down a trap street once on the way to a new tutoring gig. I got lost, was late, and had to sheepishly call the family to ask for directions. Just glad I had a printout of the directions to show them. Never used it for anything essential after that. Thanks a lot, Google Maps. You'd think they'd have the decency to add a "don't route down this street" flag to their trap streets.

That doesn't really make any sense: "trap streets" make sense and are used in, say, the base map that you see when viewing a Google map (that is, in the raster data). But why would Google bother putting a trap street into their own (proprietary) street data used for routing? Unless you are saying that Google Maps "directed" you in the sense that you were looking at a printout of a map that included a trap street, not actually a turn-by-turn.

Re: Trap street

#14

We did the same sort of thing in the pkzip source code 20 years ago. There were a number of pointless routines in the program that would be clear evidence of code theft. These days I suppose an optimizing compiler would be smart enough to strip away any truly dead ends.

Ironic given that pkzip copied arc's source code

Re: Trap street

#15
This seems like it gets posted every week. I have to say so what? Is it not totally understandable? I mean, cartography is an invaluable tool and because there information is public knowledge there has to be some way to stop those would cut corners and copy a map. Does it lead people astray sometimes? Sure. But is it causing so much harm that the practice needs to be called into question? No.

I'm not really sure why this gets posted here without any context though. Is this supposed to be a statement about copyright? If so, I have to say I'm really sick of these clever attempts to show how copyright is bad. Copyright is not good or bad in and of itself. It can be both and any discussion of it in absolute terms is ridiculous.

Re: Trap street

#16
post #4

Google Maps directed me down a trap street once on the way to a new tutoring gig. I got lost, was late, and had to sheepishly call the family to ask for directions. Just glad I had a printout of the directions to show them. Never used it for anything essential after that. Thanks a lot, Google Maps. You'd think they'd have the decency to add a "don't route down this street" flag to their trap streets.

I'm guessing google doesn't do its own cartography work, especially with roads. Most of that is probably coming from free government sources like this http://www2.census.gov/geo/tiger/TIGER2012/ROADS/

http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/09/how-go...

Re: Trap street

#17

This seems like it gets posted every week. I have to say so what? Is it not totally understandable? I mean, cartography is an invaluable tool and because there information is public knowledge there has to be some way to stop those would cut corners and copy a map. Does it lead people astray sometimes? Sure. But is it causing so much harm that the practice needs to be called into question? No. I'm not really sure why…

I don't think the original posting was taking aim at copyright infringement. I think it's just a neat idea that appeals to the hacker instinct - which is why it keeps popping up again and again.

Re: Trap street

#19

I wonder if it would be possible to automatically compare goog vs. bing, identify discrepancies and come out with a 'clean' map?

Wouldn't you need a third one to identify which map has the trap street?

Or a satellite photo.
Post reply on HN