Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Content producers need to do their part alongside developers to make it great Uh...why? Why should they "do their part" for a platform where they have no users and don't see a likely growth of them? I am an Android user and developer, but I am also realistic.
Because that investment will pay off over time as more and more people move to Android, and a platform that isn't controlled by a single company will make innovation easier for everyone.
Why we’ve decided to stop producing TNW Magazine for Android
21–30 of 50 posts
Re: Why we’ve decided to stop producing TNW Magazine for Android
#22Re: Why we’ve decided to stop producing TNW Magazine for Android
#23I have an application out for Android & iPhone both with same exact functionality. The Android version sells maybe 10 a day max while iPhone constantly sells 10x that. I'm becoming more and more convinced the Android market is just not that attractive.
Re: Why we’ve decided to stop producing TNW Magazine for Android
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's some legwork to do to make the claims you're making. Maybe you should step back and establish niceties like why people who are in their target demos will flock to Android "over time" and quantify how the NPV of investing now will pay off later.
It's well known that Android has overtaken iOS in terms of the base OS. A hardware advantage that Apple had is almost gone now, so the only thing missing is content. I don't think iOS buyers are fanatics or taken in by marketing because there is more marketing of Android. I think they have been choosing a better product. So, now that hardware and the OS no-longer favor iOS, it's simply down to content providers to ma…
This is not well known, although it's an opinion often voiced here.
"Why shouldn't content producers do the same?"
Because they are not utopian technologists? This article is about a content producer that invested in Android yet failed. Instead of talking about how the content producers need to do more, we should be talking about why this effort failed.
Here's a start: when you buy an iphone today the Newsstand is one of a handful of Apps you start with. It's featured and people click on it and then many of them start buying and consuming content. What is the competing experience on Android? I assume there's no equivalent to the standalone Newsstand App installed by default on the phone. I assume they hit Play, which incidentally is terribly named and many customers never click on ever because they think it only leads to pokemon. Then they have to know that Magazines on their Device are a thing now and find them on which may be easy or hard in Play but is still an order of magnitude harder than it is on iOS.
Re: Why we’ve decided to stop producing TNW Magazine for Android
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's some legwork to do to make the claims you're making. Maybe you should step back and establish niceties like why people who are in their target demos will flock to Android "over time" and quantify how the NPV of investing now will pay off later.
It's well known that Android has overtaken iOS in terms of the base OS. A hardware advantage that Apple had is almost gone now, so the only thing missing is content. I don't think iOS buyers are fanatics or taken in by marketing because there is more marketing of Android. I think they have been choosing a better product. So, now that hardware and the OS no-longer favor iOS, it's simply down to content providers to ma…
I wouldn't say it's "well known" at all and I certainly wouldn't say it in such definite terms--and I am an Android user.
> Why shouldn't content producers do the same?
Because they have not yet decided that their projected returns from devoting significant resources to Android outweighs the opportunity costs? They have no ties to Android unless they will realize benefits from targeting it. The purchase patterns of current Android customers doesn't make me as a user and a fan of the platform think they're going to make back their money on investment, so I certainly don't think that they're unreasonable to want to actually see some assurances of a decent return before investing in the platform.
Re: Why we’ve decided to stop producing TNW Magazine for Android
#26Re: Why we’ve decided to stop producing TNW Magazine for Android
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
The selling point of the magazine is that it's not just the website, it has it's own content.
So put the content on the website and charge for it?
Re: Why we’ve decided to stop producing TNW Magazine for Android
#28I have an application out for Android & iPhone both with same exact functionality. The Android version sells maybe 10 a day max while iPhone constantly sells 10x that. I'm becoming more and more convinced the Android market is just not that attractive.
Re: Why we’ve decided to stop producing TNW Magazine for Android
#29I have an application out for Android & iPhone both with same exact functionality. The Android version sells maybe 10 a day max while iPhone constantly sells 10x that. I'm becoming more and more convinced the Android market is just not that attractive.
A well structured Android application is like a mashup of different screens, processing (services), event handlers (broadcast receivers), data (content providers), user accounts etc. And it works with other components on the system, not its own little island as on iOS.
You haven't stated what your app is so this issue may not apply. A good example of a bad app is "Beat The Traffic" which is terrible on Android being an iOS port.