Live data from Hacker News

Nvidia announces native GPU programming in Rust

developer.nvidia.com

241–250 of 334 posts

Re: Nvidia announces native GPU programming in Rust

#241

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It doesn't read as emphasis to me. It reads like the person is trying hard not to curse, and they think "crap" is a curse word. It's a little bit adorable, like I'm reading a comment from an obedient child.

I guess you are not from the generation of texters. This how languages work we used to use * as a way to avoid getting censored it over time became a way to curse or give emphasis.

Is that a cultural/national thing instead of an age thing?

I've never had texts censored by texting providers, they're not supposed to read texts in the first place (at least around here).

Re: Nvidia announces native GPU programming in Rust

#242
post #88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

HN definitely doesn't give a crap about that word.

I have written many words far worse than "crap" on this site. I haven't gotten in trouble over it yet. I do find it a little amusing, because commenters stopped criticizing my cursing the moment I started getting a good chunk of karma here. I remember in 2016 someone criticized me for using the term "shitposting"...I don't think I've gotten that kind of criticism since 2016 though.

Back then the term was still associated with 4chan.

Re: Nvidia announces native GPU programming in Rust

#243

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I guess you are not from the generation of texters. This how languages work we used to use * as a way to avoid getting censored it over time became a way to curse or give emphasis.

Sounds like a generational thing. I grew up texting. But in the 90s any profanity filters could just be turned off in settings.

You had profanity filters for SMS?

Re: Nvidia announces native GPU programming in Rust

#245
post #236
post #154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've found sorta the opposite - in any area, it can just do everything for you, or it can be an incredible teacher. I've been re-learning a lot of higher-level math and it has been an knowledgeable, infinitely patient, always-available tutor. Of course, I could just have it do just about any math I want for me, but that's not the point. Kinda the same with language/technology stuff - it can be a great tutor and it ca…

> I've found sorta the opposite - in any area, it can just do everything for you, or it can be an incredible teacher. Please don't. I've had all of Codex, Claude and Gemini convincingly tell me absolutely wrong stuff, pointing it out with easily verifiable example they come up with more and more weird reasons. Things don't become correct simply because most sources are again - easily and logically verifiable - wrong.…

> Please don't.

I will.

Can these be wrong? Certainly. So can humans. Many of your examples are of humans being wrong. That doesn't make LLMs - or humans - useless. The fact that they are not infallible is not a reason to avoid using them and I'm not going to throw out a tool that has been incredibly valuable to me because someone on the internet got some bad CORS advice.

Re: Nvidia announces native GPU programming in Rust

#247
post #153

Really exciting but it reads like Claude instead of what Nvidia posts have generally been like in the past. I don't need nor want my tech blogs to sound like a young adult novel.

I’ve had this happen to me several time over the past weeks and it’s gone from quaint to humorous to farcical to outright “is-the-world-gaslighting-me” insane. Just today I was reading Stanley Druckenmiller’s op ed in WSJ. This dude is like 80 and has made billions of dollars, and he got Claude to write his op ed??? Unbelievable. And the tells are so obvious, yet people still love the Claude-like quips and odd gramma…

That op ed was absurd. I respect Druckenmiller a lot and am always impressed with his lucidity in interviews. The Claude “ick” was all over his writing.

Re: Nvidia announces native GPU programming in Rust

#248
post #178

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Having the compiler give an error when you mess up is a huge benefit. Shouldn't this be alleviated by the current code generation machines?

Well yeah, but then you are using code generation, not writing code directly.

I meant LLMs :-)

Re: Nvidia announces native GPU programming in Rust

#249

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It doesn't read as emphasis to me. It reads like the person is trying hard not to curse, and they think "crap" is a curse word. It's a little bit adorable, like I'm reading a comment from an obedient child.

I guess you are not from the generation of texters. This how languages work we used to use * as a way to avoid getting censored it over time became a way to curse or give emphasis.

I'm definitely from the generation of texters and there was never any censorship going on with SMSs... yours must be a cultural or regional thing.

Re: Nvidia announces native GPU programming in Rust

#250
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I strongly dislike CUDA. Once you have allowed that proprietary cr*p Genuine question...why not just type "crap"? It's not even that much of a curse, but I've never really understood the point of self-censorship. If you don't want to curse then you could just use a non-curse word.

His kids were probably watching him type over his shoulder and he didn’t want to hear, “Daddy, what does crap mean?”

I'd consider that a joke - but also zero issue using any words talking in front of kids. You might wish to explain them anyways.
Post reply on HN