Earlier quoted context omitted.
If a AWS customer chooses to store their data in a single AZ, that is a design choice. AWS is not taking a daily copy of a entire regions S3 cluster and driving it to some warehouse for a "just in case" situation. That is why Multi-AZ exists.
Isn't S3 claiming eleven nines of data durability? https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/ "Additionally, S3 stores data redundantly across a minimum of 3 Availability Zones by default, providing built-in resilience against widespread disaster." I wonder if "can't restore some data" includes any S3 data? I'd expect to lose EC2 instance EBS data in the event of a datacenter being destroyed, but I kinda assume I wou…
AWS says it can't restore some data from mideast facilities struck by Iran
151–160 of 468 posts
Re: AWS says it can't restore some data from mideast facilities struck by Iran
#152Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you can not restore data from EU based Amazon Datacenters because it’s destroyed … you will definitely have better things to do like packing your go bag or buying the last groceries for a while.
Ah yeah, the EU, a historically stable area.
Re: AWS says it can't restore some data from mideast facilities struck by Iran
#153Earlier quoted context omitted.
The SLA excludes force majeure.
Making a probabilistic claim while excluding a factor that dominates those statistics is... is quite creative accounting.
Re: AWS says it can't restore some data from mideast facilities struck by Iran
#154Hey but that's exactly as per design. It is the customer's responsibility to store stuff elsewhere as DR backup, not AWS.
Re: AWS says it can't restore some data from mideast facilities struck by Iran
#155[flagged]
Can you post the specs on your missile defense system for your home lab? How are you dealing with the rise of low-cast swarm attacks from drones? Is it land-based, sea-based or space-based and at what point of the trajectory do you target and do you use jamming?
Re: AWS says it can't restore some data from mideast facilities struck by Iran
#156This interview with an AWS leader isn’t aging well, from CBS Sunday morning: Pogue asked, "I don't mean to give anyone ideas, but let's say I figured out that one of these unmarked buildings was an AWS data center, and I blew it up. Are you saying that it's so backed up and redundant that you probably wouldn't notice?" Wood replied, "Yeah, you wouldn't notice. I mean, we might be a bit upset, but you wouldn't notice!…
He forgot to add "if it's Multi-AZ" ;)
Re: AWS says it can't restore some data from mideast facilities struck by Iran
#157It was always a bad bet for billionaires like Bezos to become Trump enablers. You weren't buying a seat at the table, or the privilege of being left alone, you were just signing yourself up to be force-fed shit sandwiches over and over (And the shit-to-bread ratio gets worse as time goes on) You should have used your considerable resources to fight. If only billionaires would oppose aspiring tyrants with the same zea…
Re: AWS says it can't restore some data from mideast facilities struck by Iran
#158Re: AWS says it can't restore some data from mideast facilities struck by Iran
#159Re: AWS says it can't restore some data from mideast facilities struck by Iran
#160Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Do you know why Iranians were chanting "Death To America"? Because we toppled their democratically elected government in 1953 and installed a brutal dictator so that we could continue to pillage their oil.(1) When the mullahs finally toppled that dictator in 1979 they had reason to be angry with us. This is especially true because almost immediately afterwards, in the 1980s, we used our proxy Saddam Hussein to launch…