Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

macOS 27 Golden Gate – Review

arstechnica.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

91–100 of 160 posts

Re: macOS 27 Golden Gate – Review

#91

Post by Terretta »

nikanj wrote: post #10

All of my stuff updated to the 27 versions today. During indoor cycling class, I kept getting health alerts on my watch about high heart rate while stationary. Despite currently having the very same apple watch tracking my indoor cycling workout. I guess Claude doesn’t take spinning classes

heart recovery is one of several headline new features they mention on first run (and in app ref info) will calibrate over time

as often the case when Apple makes its move, their implementations -- while late compared to e.g. Garmin which has had them for years -- purport to be leading accuracy on these features among wearables

Re: macOS 27 Golden Gate – Review

#92

Post by simlevesque »

rmnclmnt wrote: post #34
simlevesque wrote: post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yesterday I managed to update a 2015 MacBookAir7,2 from El Capitan (last update Sep. 2015) to Sonoma (last update Aug 6th 2026). I was excited when it finally worked. Thanks to the OpenCore Legacy Patcher who show that not supporting old devices is a choice made by Apple.

OCLP is excellent but it's all coming to an end for Intel Macs unfortunately. Even Homebrew just dropped the ball a few days ago (this is the final draw for me, I'll keep a Sequoia partition but my MBP2015 daily drives on NixOS + GNOME)

Yes. If anyone reads this in the future: you need to clone the brew repo and use v7.0.2 and install it manually.

Re: macOS 27 Golden Gate – Review

#93

Post by sharts »

ProfessorLayton wrote: post #27

"...Golden Gate needed a whopping 17GB more space on the M1 MacBook Air, thanks to a mandatory multi-gigabyte language model download that kicks in automatically the first time you connect a freshly restored Golden Gate Mac to the Internet." This is the main thing stopping me from updating iOS/macOS. It's completely unacceptable to park a bunch of space on my devices right when that storage is at its most expensive i…

Phones should have separate storage for their OS so that when you buy a specific phone with specific storage it actually is that much storage available to the user

Re: macOS 27 Golden Gate – Review

#94

Post by samtheprogram »

ProfessorLayton wrote: post #27

"...Golden Gate needed a whopping 17GB more space on the M1 MacBook Air, thanks to a mandatory multi-gigabyte language model download that kicks in automatically the first time you connect a freshly restored Golden Gate Mac to the Internet." This is the main thing stopping me from updating iOS/macOS. It's completely unacceptable to park a bunch of space on my devices right when that storage is at its most expensive i…

Maybe macOS 26 was lot bigger... but I went straight from Sequoia to Golden Gate and freed up like 30 GBs. I didn't have enough disk space to download the update prior, so the extra 30 GB wasn't that... but could've been caches I guess. I assumed it was dropping Intel?

Re: macOS 27 Golden Gate – Review

#95

Post by reddit_clone »

dr_dshiv wrote: post #63
Telaneo wrote: post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm stuck trying to figure out what new stuff they could add. Sidecar was neat, but I never need it. I'm very happy on Cinnamon on Linux, which is probably less featured than KDE (haven't daily driven it to confirm), which just confirms I don't actually need or want user-facing new features. I need stability. I think Apple realise this. There are no genuine new OS features to be added, so they just shuffle things aro…

Something to improve my mess of ~22 active terminal windows comes to mind.

Have you tried other 3rd party terminal applications? (Iterm, ghostel, CMux)

They have many quality of life improvements over the basic terminal.

Re: macOS 27 Golden Gate – Review

#97

Post by LoganDark »

agos wrote: post #48
LoganDark wrote: post #2

A few macOS betas ago, a bunch of sites started failing to play video for me in Safari. Disney+, Netflix, YouTube and some other sites will sit at a black screen for a few seconds and then give me an error. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Sometimes certain videos will reliably fail while others reliably work fine. I thought this was related to Safari's autoplay protections, but I tried giving permission to…

Hey sorry to be the debugging guy in the comments, but maybe your network issues could be related to iCloud relay? I’ve had similar issues

Maybe, but it's weird that it started across all these different sites after an OS update. Netflix finally stopped accusing me of not being in the "household", but trying to disable Private Relay hasn't been able to fix a video not playing.

Re: macOS 27 Golden Gate – Review

#99

Post by quantumwannabe »

ProfessorLayton wrote: post #27

"...Golden Gate needed a whopping 17GB more space on the M1 MacBook Air, thanks to a mandatory multi-gigabyte language model download that kicks in automatically the first time you connect a freshly restored Golden Gate Mac to the Internet." This is the main thing stopping me from updating iOS/macOS. It's completely unacceptable to park a bunch of space on my devices right when that storage is at its most expensive i…

The real problem with iOS is that there’s no way to clear an app’s cache without uninstalling it. Every non-indie internet-connected app on my phone has a massive and unneeded cache that consumes gigabytes of space.

Re: macOS 27 Golden Gate – Review

#100

Post by jerlam »

TheAmazingRace wrote: post #9
troupo wrote: post #3

> an understated update that in other years might have been called a “Snow Leopard release.” No. It wouldn't. Snow Leopard was two years in the making, and then took another few years to actually become the Snow Leopard people remember. Fixing some transparency and re-drawing a few icons is not a Snow Leopard release. Like, which features in this 150000-character blog post actually warrant the title of "Snow Leopard…

I imagine the author saw this release as "macOS Tahoe but not sucky" I liken it to Windows Vista and Windows 7. Although fundamentally similar operating systems under the hood, Windows 7 smoothed out Vista's kinks and brought forth additional polish.

I wouldn't mind if they (unofficially) adopted a tick-tock release cycle. New features on even years, refinement and under-the-hood changes on odd years.
Post reply on HN