Live data from Hacker News

Dropping eBPF CPU Cost by About 90% with Memoization (Not AI Gen)

31–33 of 33 posts

Re: Dropping eBPF CPU Cost by About 90% with Memoization (Not AI Gen)

#31

Post by notpushkin » Tue, Sep 15, 2026, 11:02 AM UTC

visarga wrote: post #25

> Not AI Gen I am not sure how to react ... of course good thing it's human-gen, but I still like a few AI passes over it to tighten it up. LOL

> I still like a few AI passes over it to tighten it up. LOL

Go ahead, it’s open source: https://github.com/bomfather/agent

Re: Dropping eBPF CPU Cost by About 90% with Memoization (Not AI Gen)

#32

Post by Eastmill » Tue, Sep 15, 2026, 12:43 PM UTC

Simple memoization yields massive wins. Had similar experience with a hot loop, sometimes the basics are just magic.

Re: Dropping eBPF CPU Cost by About 90% with Memoization (Not AI Gen)

#33

Post by WhenItRuns » Wed, Sep 16, 2026, 12:48 PM UTC

brookman64k wrote: post #24

How is the cache invalidated when: - The permissions change? - Directories are moved? - Hard-links are added? - Things are deleted? Also: Is the cache limited in size?

[flagged]

Post reply on HN