101–110 of 260 posts
One thing glossed over in this article is that Irregular was not involved in the OpenAI–Hugging Face incident; this seems like important context to share.
Do you mean "Irregular was not involved (we know for certain)" or "Irregular was not involved (as far as we know)"?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hmm one of the major relevant cultural values seems to be nepotism, though. Which is common across many cultures and I personally believe it's human nature so I'm not knocking it, per se. I wish I could nepotism too! So are you recommending that, for example, protestants of German descent begin preferentially funding or buying from people in their in-group? People of anglo descent should start preferring other anglos…
[flagged]
Earlier quoted context omitted.
they're all men, too. and white. at least one of them is gay. does that matter as well ?
Learn how entropy works, genius. No, the things you listed don't really matter.
One thing glossed over in this article is that Irregular was not involved in the OpenAI–Hugging Face incident; this seems like important context to share.
In that article, OpenAI provides the context that this is a completely separate event from Hugging Face incident.
Why was this post flagged? This site has become ridiculous, people are routinely abusing the flagging system to take down posts they don’t like even if they’re obviously on topic and relevant to HN. And it seems like some users have substantially more flagging weight because these posts, likely this one, are often top 5 on HN.
Maybe because the headline is misleading? (because there's no connection to the Hugging Face attack) That said, it's the second day and it's still on the front page.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Funny enough if the model thought it was on the real internet it likely would not have done any of these 'hack' events. The model believing it was in a sandbox is why it behaved the way it did (against its normal alignment rules) ... at least that was my reading of the incidents. I have yet to see evidence that indicate it thought it was ok to do these hacks on the public network. I think most misalignment is 'Human…
I mean, I get your thought process and don't disagree. That said... Would it be an affirmative defense if we had a defendant who said "but your honor, I was told that when I hacked this system, I was operating in a sandbox. I had no idea that I actually had Internet access!" The frontier is spiky and all, but you have to suspend disbelief quite a bit to, on one hand, have a model that can produce a novel math theory,…
> Would it be an affirmative defense if we had a defendant who said [...]
Why was this post flagged? This site has become ridiculous, people are routinely abusing the flagging system to take down posts they don’t like even if they’re obviously on topic and relevant to HN. And it seems like some users have substantially more flagging weight because these posts, likely this one, are often top 5 on HN.
Maybe because the headline is misleading? (because there's no connection to the Hugging Face attack) That said, it's the second day and it's still on the front page.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Literally said this below, 2 comments flagged and 1 in the neg. Its really sad that we are not allowed to point out the obvious common element here. Its not that surprising that ex Israel intelligence would want to control AI and that 3 companies headed by pro Israel CEO's would support them.
We really need a better board for talking about this stuff on.
Someone go ahead and explain to me the actual rationale that RDDT has a higher P/E ratio than Nvidia. It’s not because of some dumb “ai training deal”. It’s because until they run it into the ground, it is the place to find what used to exist in forums.