Alternatives to MinIO for single-node local S3
11–20 of 112 posts
Re: Alternatives to MinIO for single-node local S3
#12Re: Alternatives to MinIO for single-node local S3
#13Re: Alternatives to MinIO for single-node local S3
#14Re: Alternatives to MinIO for single-node local S3
#15A notable mention should also be Versity GW, https://github.com/versity/versitygw/
Re: Alternatives to MinIO for single-node local S3
#16Re: Alternatives to MinIO for single-node local S3
#17Re: Alternatives to MinIO for single-node local S3
#18I enjoyed the smooth transition from minio to RustFS quite a lot.
On flipside the project maintainers react very fast on any bug I submitted and it's fixed pretty quickly, so not really complaint, just warning
Re: Alternatives to MinIO for single-node local S3
#19Re: Alternatives to MinIO for single-node local S3
#20The title is 'for single node local S3' but what they actually mean is 'for minio-compatibility', which is an entirely different question.
When I abandoned minio a year or so ago, I also surveyed the options, and settled on Garage. It lacked the GUI, but felt about the same complexity as minio. Perhaps a smidge more complexity, as I moved to 3-node and 5-node separate instances of garage, running as containers under Nomad.
I don't recall it being onerous, but I was looking for some basic S3-alike capabilities, not just minio-alike.
(How many people set out to build an object storage system with some number of AWS S3 primitives, but primarily try to match a third-party proprietary system's foibles?)
> So, Garage does work, but gosh…it is not just a drop-in replacement in terms of code changes.
I think in terms of actual code that uses local S3, it pretty much was a drop-in replacement. (I have multiple distribution/registry, Grafana Loki / Mimir, influx3 - all backing onto my object storage system, and the config changes there were modest - key+secret, and url - just as you'd expect.)