Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, please. Linux distros is better with macos approach. And making appimage first class makes a lot of sense.
I'll avoid it at this point anyway. The Rust coreutils is another reason for that. Snap, monetizing updates, telemetry, enough is enough.
Ubuntu 26.10 completes transition to Rust-based coreutils
111–120 of 339 posts
Re: Ubuntu 26.10 completes transition to Rust-based coreutils
#112I really don't understand why Canonical rushes this. If 'rm' can't remove all possible directory entries, that is a big issue: $ podman run --rm -it ubuntu:26.10 $ apt update -y; apt upgrade -y $ rm --version rm (uutils coreutils) 0.10.0 $ gnumkdir -p $(yes a/ | head -n $((32 * 1024)) | tr -d '\n') $ rm -rf a Segmentation fault (core dumped) rm -rf a $ ls a a $ gnurm -rf a $ ls a ls: cannot access 'a': No such file o…
Let them first fix Snap.
It will die so just leave it alone.
Re: Ubuntu 26.10 completes transition to Rust-based coreutils
#113Re: Ubuntu 26.10 completes transition to Rust-based coreutils
#114Was there something wrong with how they are currently written or do they just want the badge that says they converted to Rust?
My source is this interview with the VP of Engineering at Canonical on this topic: https://corrode.dev/podcast/s05e05-canonical/
Re: Ubuntu 26.10 completes transition to Rust-based coreutils
#115I really don't understand why Canonical rushes this. If 'rm' can't remove all possible directory entries, that is a big issue: $ podman run --rm -it ubuntu:26.10 $ apt update -y; apt upgrade -y $ rm --version rm (uutils coreutils) 0.10.0 $ gnumkdir -p $(yes a/ | head -n $((32 * 1024)) | tr -d '\n') $ rm -rf a Segmentation fault (core dumped) rm -rf a $ ls a a $ gnurm -rf a $ ls a ls: cannot access 'a': No such file o…
Re: Ubuntu 26.10 completes transition to Rust-based coreutils
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
yeah, this is a bug. And yes, it should be fixed. But I don't think it will affect many users, I mean who has a 32000 -evels deep directory on their system?
What programmer or programming language can't iterate a loop more than 32000 times?!
Re: Ubuntu 26.10 completes transition to Rust-based coreutils
#117Hmm, this doesn’t make sense. You simply don’t replace utilities with many decades of maturity and that “just work” with something that is not as mature. It will open all users of the distro to all sorts of subtle and not so subtle bugs. I for one don’t want to find myself staring at a mysterious segfault when I want to build the latest version of nodejs or flash a microcontroller. It’s such a pity; I have used Ubunt…
then install the other tool. no one is holding a gun to your head. it isn't windows.
Re: Ubuntu 26.10 completes transition to Rust-based coreutils
#118Re: Ubuntu 26.10 completes transition to Rust-based coreutils
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
They need to kill snap ...
Yes, please. Linux distros is better with macos approach. And making appimage first class makes a lot of sense.
Flatpak uses shared stable runtimes that are the same everywhere and don't take up space more than once. It also comes with a native update system and sandboxing. Snap is the same thing but worse.
Re: Ubuntu 26.10 completes transition to Rust-based coreutils
#120Earlier quoted context omitted.
What programmer or programming language can't iterate a loop more than 32000 times?!
When triaging an issue you have to prioritise. Do you fix a problem that affects 2-3 people or one that may affect thousands?
Using recursion on unbounded inputs on a programming language that doesn't support that (which are most) is an extremely classical mistake that really should be known to all programmers, especially those of low level languages that care about safety.
Every time you call something recursively you should be thinking "how deep is this?".