Live data from Hacker News

I'm not addicted to the internet or my smartphone. I'm addicted to information

explorator.dev

21–30 of 83 posts

Re: I'm not addicted to the internet or my smartphone. I'm addicted to information

#21
post #6

I think I'm similar. But why didn't people talk about newspaper addiction back then? Sometimes I wonder—even before smartphones, people spent that time reading books, looking up information, and reading newspapers. That kind of addiction was seen as "positive." But in reality, it was probably disrupting daily life too, in its own way. When I see things like this, it sometimes occurs to me that the people who create "…

But newspapers end and then each one cost money.

Re: I'm not addicted to the internet or my smartphone. I'm addicted to information

#22
post #12
post #6

I think I'm similar. But why didn't people talk about newspaper addiction back then? Sometimes I wonder—even before smartphones, people spent that time reading books, looking up information, and reading newspapers. That kind of addiction was seen as "positive." But in reality, it was probably disrupting daily life too, in its own way. When I see things like this, it sometimes occurs to me that the people who create "…

You can read a lot of the newspaper and still finish by the end of breakfast. It isn't personalized, so many sections aren't of much interest.

But when I think about it, communities like HN don't exactly have only the taste I want either, do they?

That's always the case, really. There are people whose daily lives fall apart because they read too many books, but that usually isn't categorized as a form of addiction. So sometimes I wonder how addiction is actually defined.

Re: I'm not addicted to the internet or my smartphone. I'm addicted to information

#25
This is like saying, "I'm not addicted to smoking, I'm addicted to the happiness cigarettes give me." Addiction is a harmful dependency you pursue to achieve some desired outcome. The harmful dependency is the endless browsing, scrolling, and searching you engage in to obtain it, all the time wasted doing it and doing it in a way that consumes a significant amount of time that could be spent acquiring that same information in a more productive manner.

That's the addiction, not the information.

Re: I'm not addicted to the internet or my smartphone. I'm addicted to information

#26

Just a small note and I'm guessing this is an intentional aesthetic choice but the chromatic aberration makes the text very uncomfortable to read.

As someone with keratoconus, I hardly noticed! This is what all text looks like for me.

Re: I'm not addicted to the internet or my smartphone. I'm addicted to information

#27
post #25

This is like saying, "I'm not addicted to smoking, I'm addicted to the happiness cigarettes give me." Addiction is a harmful dependency you pursue to achieve some desired outcome. The harmful dependency is the endless browsing, scrolling, and searching you engage in to obtain it, all the time wasted doing it and doing it in a way that consumes a significant amount of time that could be spent acquiring that same infor…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dopamine

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reward_system

Re: I'm not addicted to the internet or my smartphone. I'm addicted to information

#28
post #18

I don't think I've seen a less accessible *font* in my life, including all the dark grey on black and yellow on white ones. Those are hard to read, but this one makes my eyes hurt, they actually started to hurt after I tried reading it despite discomfort. How come? Reading random text for 10 seconds can cause people physical pain? I wear glasses for near-sightedness and slight astigmatism, I wonder if it's related, a…

I thought it was me, I literally think there are things that should no longer be acceptable and this font is one of them. It serves no purpose and I would like to ask medical professionals if it is potentially harmful.

Edit: While fuzzy or blurry text itself is highly unlikely to trigger an epileptic seizure it is a major cause of optical strain, headaches, and reading barriers across various accessibility needs. Given the amount of screen time we all incur in our daily lives, I do not see why this should be a "thing".

Post reply on HN