51–52 of 52 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think that agriculture and textiles are generally among the first recognized technology. I've never seen them overlooked, quite the opposite.
Today by modern historians. Real the ancient historians and you will see these are often overlooked.
There are certain bodies of human knowledge and practice which aren't usually referred to as "technologies", and I think that leads us to underestimate their complexity and importance. In particular, I'm thinking of textiles and agriculture. It's no coincidence that both were prime targets of industrial mechanization, occupying a huge proportion of all human labor.
I think that agriculture and textiles are generally among the first recognized technology. I've never seen them overlooked, quite the opposite.
Suppose someone leads with: "I'm investing in new technological improvements to my farm". Most people are going to think that means robots, GPS tractors, or special pesticides... Rather than a new procedure allows legumes to be planted more-densely and harvested more quickly. So even when the context is literally a farm, somehow "technology" means electronics/genetics/chemistry rather than agronomics.
Give the average person a booklet with an algorithm for toxic-vs-edible mushrooms developed over generations of careful study and experiment. "Is it technology?" Probably only once you port it to a minimally interactive phone-app.