201–210 of 248 posts
How does this work, legally? I think that RubyGems could file a civil suit against OpenAI, but for a naïve non-lawyer reading this seems like a pretty clear cut criminal violation of the computer fraud and abuse act.
Tort law is very general: Contribute toward harming someone -> civil suit for damages $$$
Earlier quoted context omitted.
So we make a law that the CEO is responsible for actions of any agent created or operated by anyone in their company. CEOs will get serious about AI security real quick. Honestly we need to do something. There needs to be a single wringable neck.
> There needs to be a single wringable neck. Does there? Could be the whole c-suite/board.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
In this case, who holds the agency is exactly the point. Anthropic and OAI are claiming we need protection from AI itself, but the statement supported by putting agency in the right place is that we need protection from them .
I think those companies are referring to other companies - say Chinese AI companies - who we also need protection from.
Ah, the infamous Crimson Wave.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I believe both sides of the war are now using AI on various levels of their offensive operations. Ukraine has great IT specialists too, and their military leadership is much younger.
How? Aren't all US frontier models ban the usage of AI for military purpose by parties other than US? I remember Anthropic even refusing allowing US government to use Claude for military purpose
Earlier quoted context omitted.
How is the responsibility diluted? Charge the CEO…
Great, you’re the attorney at the CEO’s trial. To get a conviction, you’re going to have to show that he willfully committed this specific crime. There are no negligent or stochastic hacking laws, you have to show this specific crime was at his direction. Do you think there is evidence of this?
CEO is responsible for letting this to happen, not enforcing enough supervision, if not intentionally, then being grossly negligent. More severe if encouraging and letting this kind of agent research and operations happen at scale, while knowing that it can damage other systems and businesses.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
He did not fall out of a window. He fell out of the sky . After his plane exploded. Happens all the time. Is tragedy.
I was alluding to how people who fall out of favor with Putin have a tendency to have mysterious fatal accidents, more than 10 of them falling out of windows.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think those companies are referring to other companies - say Chinese AI companies - who we also need protection from.
"We" need protection from, or "OpenAI and Anthroptic's dreams of profits" need protection from?
So yes, I would like to be protected from all parties. I don't think that's nuts.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
These agent swarms are from inside OpenAI, with the safeguards built into the public API disabled. Russia does not have access to this, and as with all western tech companies, AI providers do what they can to prevent Russian usage of their products at all. As for open-source models, Russia's electricity grid is under severe strain with the Ukraine war, and only recently has it started building out serious sovereign c…
Couldn't they use frontier open-weight models from Chinese labs? The current Chinese government is friendly to them.