Live data from Hacker News

China's Regulators Take Aim at "AI Boyfriends"

spectrum.ieee.org

11–20 of 50 posts

Re: China's Regulators Take Aim at "AI Boyfriends"

#11

Yes, Gov's require populations to have "real" offspring. Authoritarian or not, this makes sense. IMO its only a matter of time before some version of this hits the US; if it has not already.

That will only be true until it occurs to them to tax robotic productivity. This whole issue feels like a temporary one.

Re: China's Regulators Take Aim at "AI Boyfriends"

#13
The CCP trying to get fertility rates up by cracking down on lesbians, paying money for children and now cracking down on whatever this is.

It's no use, though. You need a good economic and social outlook to get people to even consider having children. And this ain't it.

Re: China's Regulators Take Aim at "AI Boyfriends"

#14
post #6

I kinda feel like if people have to turn to AI for companionship, it's the same as using AI for therapy - because the real thing isn't available and any number of systems have failed those people along the way. In a sense, that might be a bit telling of the modern day society: in what world is it so difficult to make meaningful connections to people, that if a real human relationship can be like 5x more meaningful (m…

My $0.02 is when it comes to dating, social media ruined people’s “standards” [0]

People would rather chill and be single than date the wrong guy, even if they aren’t bringing much to the table themselves…

[0] - same energy as the teen girls have low self esteem due to magazine covers and instagram.

Re: China's Regulators Take Aim at "AI Boyfriends"

#15

Yes, Gov's require populations to have "real" offspring. Authoritarian or not, this makes sense. IMO its only a matter of time before some version of this hits the US; if it has not already.

Maybe we can have the government provide token quotas as you have offspring.

Zero children = you (the parent) get zero tokens

One child = the parents get 18-years worth of tokens

Two children = the parents get 2 x 18-years worth of tokens

...

Re: China's Regulators Take Aim at "AI Boyfriends"

#16

The CCP trying to get fertility rates up by cracking down on lesbians, paying money for children and now cracking down on whatever this is. It's no use, though. You need a good economic and social outlook to get people to even consider having children. And this ain't it.

Personally no amount of social outlook would want me want children. I simply don't want to have them I don't like raising or interacting with children it's just not in my nature and I really feel like a lot of that has to do with how people are nurtured.

Re: China's Regulators Take Aim at "AI Boyfriends"

#17
post #6

I kinda feel like if people have to turn to AI for companionship, it's the same as using AI for therapy - because the real thing isn't available and any number of systems have failed those people along the way. In a sense, that might be a bit telling of the modern day society: in what world is it so difficult to make meaningful connections to people, that if a real human relationship can be like 5x more meaningful (m…

If people are born into a situation or simply have had bad luck with who they decided to trust, after enough betrayal you decide that juice of relationships isn't worth the squeeze. I'm pretty much there in my life, I don't seek companionship in AI (nor can I ever imagine doing so) but more than casual friendships and especially romance is not worth the work or the pain.

Re: China's Regulators Take Aim at "AI Boyfriends"

#18

The CCP trying to get fertility rates up by cracking down on lesbians, paying money for children and now cracking down on whatever this is. It's no use, though. You need a good economic and social outlook to get people to even consider having children. And this ain't it.

Given comparison reports between people's opinions of AI and the future between China and the US, I think it is.

Re: China's Regulators Take Aim at "AI Boyfriends"

#19
post #6

I kinda feel like if people have to turn to AI for companionship, it's the same as using AI for therapy - because the real thing isn't available and any number of systems have failed those people along the way. In a sense, that might be a bit telling of the modern day society: in what world is it so difficult to make meaningful connections to people, that if a real human relationship can be like 5x more meaningful (m…

[flagged]
Post reply on HN