Live data from Hacker News

New $100k H-1B visa fee pushes tech jobs offshore

spectrum.ieee.org

261–270 of 353 posts

Re: New $100k H-1B visa fee pushes tech jobs offshore

#261

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nope, cost of living is what matters and at least at the time major Canadian metros were as if not more expensive than SF/NYC and got you a 1/4th of the pay. I am sure that’s attractive to some but sounds pretty miserable. Chile I imagine has pretty good cost of living economics. Anecdotally most of my friends in Latin and South America live upper middle class on software salaries.

> Anecdotally most of my friends in Latin and South America live upper middle class on software salaries And your North American friends do not? Please. The commonality is that software engineers all across the globe live pretty great, compared to their local peers. But of course, compare them to inflated NYC/SV salaries and everything looks like peanuts.

Sure. My point was historically Canada was pretty bad from a QOL perspective. Low salary and high cost of living. Not sure what you are trying to argue but have at it!

Re: New $100k H-1B visa fee pushes tech jobs offshore

#262
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

H1B should have never been a lottery. It should be a stack rank by salary to deal with the over subscription.

the problem is H1B is not only tech, there are nurses, some medical professionals, non-tech specialized workers. Stack rank would just give all the visas to big tech and starve US hospitals and every other industry

Medical field is under a green program. But following your point. If nursing paid more and had better conditions, it would encourage more domestic talent. H1B should be used for to get the worlds top talent otherwise it will be used by businesses to save money and depress wages.

Re: New $100k H-1B visa fee pushes tech jobs offshore

#263

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If pay and money is the only thing you care about then yeah. But for the rest of us, none of the places are "the worst place to work in tech" as long as you're in the northern hemisphere. Take a look at what the pay is in Chile if it's so scary to you.

Nope, cost of living is what matters and at least at the time major Canadian metros were as if not more expensive than SF/NYC and got you a 1/4th of the pay. I am sure that’s attractive to some but sounds pretty miserable. Chile I imagine has pretty good cost of living economics. Anecdotally most of my friends in Latin and South America live upper middle class on software salaries.

"major Canadian metros were as if not more expensive than SF/NYC"

That just isn't true. You can easily look up the cost of living for e.g. Vancouver:

> Cost of Living Including Rent in San Francisco, CA is 57.8% higher than in Vancouver

> Rent Prices in San Francisco, CA are 91.7% higher than in Vancouver

https://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/compare_cities.jsp?cou...

Re: New $100k H-1B visa fee pushes tech jobs offshore

#264

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> In fact, they actually ended up costing more to the employer than a local would, due to having to deal with immigration lawyers/filing fees/etc. (all while being paid the same as everyone else). I mean, you were actually underpaying the local workers if this was the case? If you offered the fully loaded salary to the local workers they might have accepted. Or the local going rate for qualified personel were higher…

> Or the local going rate for qualified personel were higher than you were willing to pay Whenever someone says "But then the locals making $400k would make $500k" I have to ask: where are all these qualified locals for whom $400k isn't enough money already? Shouldn't all the laid-off people be champing at the bit for these jobs? At some price point you genuinely do run out of local talent. At that point it's just a…

IME we had very few people turn down offers, and even the it was rarely about the comp.

It’s hard to get people to even interview, or find them in the first place.

Re: New $100k H-1B visa fee pushes tech jobs offshore

#265
post #240

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> In fact, they actually ended up costing more to the employer than a local would, due to having to deal with immigration lawyers/filing fees/etc. (all while being paid the same as everyone else). I mean, you were actually underpaying the local workers if this was the case? If you offered the fully loaded salary to the local workers they might have accepted. Or the local going rate for qualified personel were higher…

Workers on an H1B are more abusable though - if they lose the job they have something like 30 days to find another one or they have to leave the country entirely. So you talk a good game about work life balance and then after you hire an H1B worker and bring them to the country you can spring 60 hour weeks doing tedius things and many won't be in a position to say no. The salary might also seem higher to somebody who…

At all of my jobs everyone was treated the same.

Re: New $100k H-1B visa fee pushes tech jobs offshore

#266

Canada is jumping on this opportunity to invite the US tech workers who are frustrated with US H1B visa restrictions and GC backlog by offering an express permanent residency in 10 days https://canadabychoice.com/services/move-to-canada/usa/occup... Canada also floating idea of alliance with Europe for travel and job opportunities https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-european-union-eu-me...

Canadian salaries are terrible once you realize that the cost of living in Canada is just as high or even higher than the US, which is why a lot of Canadian engineers left for the US

This just isn't true. Yes, ratio of salary to cost of living is better in the US, setting aside the precarious immigration process, political instability, high rates of gun crime, lack of healthcare, etc. I left this reply to someone else claiming the same thing:

You can easily look up the cost of living for e.g. Vancouver:

> Cost of Living Including Rent in San Francisco, CA is 57.8% higher than in Vancouver

> Rent Prices in San Francisco, CA are 91.7% higher than in Vancouver

https://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/compare_cities.jsp?cou...

Re: New $100k H-1B visa fee pushes tech jobs offshore

#267
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not my experience in big tech and HFT. We spent a ton of time and effort trying to find anyone to our standards, never able to find enough. H1B (and other work visas) were generally better and more Sr compared to locals we found. They got paid as much or more than everyone else. When we had great people we could not get here we would instead build a team overseas, taking a bunch of other jobs with them.

While I’m more open to this kind of H1B use, you all should be investing in training local talent as well. Ideally using those H1Bs to train local talent. We put people on the moon. I find it hard to believe the people here lack the raw ability. I find it much more likely businesses don’t want to give back to the country that they’re residing in.

I learned a tremendous amount (and was very successful as a result) from foreign born colleagues (some of whom went on to be ACM fellows, and other major awards).

Having a disproportionate share of the best people world wide to work with is a great privilege and advantage.

Re: New $100k H-1B visa fee pushes tech jobs offshore

#268

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Going to a country for employment and having your legal status tied to a company is pretty standard across the world. Do you know counterexamples? TN visa

By counterexamples, I meant other countries where you get in via an employment visa and don't have your presence tied to the employer. TN visa is much more restrictive than H1B. Only for citizens of two countries, and only for certain professions. I know Canadians who have no hope of getting a TN visa (wrong profession), but have come on H1B.

Its an example right? now you are shifting goalposts to be easily available to everyone or something.

Re: New $100k H-1B visa fee pushes tech jobs offshore

#269
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not my experience in big tech and HFT. We spent a ton of time and effort trying to find anyone to our standards, never able to find enough. H1B (and other work visas) were generally better and more Sr compared to locals we found. They got paid as much or more than everyone else. When we had great people we could not get here we would instead build a team overseas, taking a bunch of other jobs with them.

Comparing getting an American to uproot themselves from their entire community to move to the Bay Area for a job vs. someone on the other side of the world who is looking to get into America just aren't the same. Ultimately, H1Bs are used to lower the working standards of Americans and enrich tiny pockets of existing regional capital holders. Regional wealth inequality in America has not gotten better as Silicon Vall…

The best people I worked from (in the bay area) were from Switzerland, Germany, the UK, France , Israel, etc.

Re: New $100k H-1B visa fee pushes tech jobs offshore

#270

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Most of them happen under the likes of the EU where citizens of member nations have the freedom to migrate. Yes, but this isn't the same. As a US citizen, I don't have that freedom in the EU, correct? > But even in the US, we have the green card (as you note) which you can get without doing H1-B. Getting a green card means your legal status isn't tied to employment. True, but we're talking about employment visas. W…

> Yes, but this isn't the same. As a US citizen, I don't have that freedom in the EU, correct? If you are from Cuba, you don't have access to the H1-B program. All nations have restrictions one which nations can and can't participate in their immigration and to what extent. So yes, it is the same, the US just isn't a part of the EU. The relationship between EU nations is much closer to the relationship (pre-trump) be…

> If you are from Cuba, you don't have access to the H1-B program. All nations have restrictions one which nations can and can't participate in their immigration and to what extent.

Yes, but the restrictions on which countries' citizens can be part of the H-1B program is tiny compared to the list of countries that cannot participate in the EU program you're mentioning. With the US, it's practically a rounding error (or was, at least pre-Trump).

> No, actually what you specifically asked for was

>> Going to a country for employment and having your legal status tied to a company is pretty standard across the world. Do you know counterexamples?

Yes, I said "Going to a country for employment". If you have a green card, you are not going to the US for employment. You are in the US, or going to the US to receive the green card. Getting employment is incidental.

Post reply on HN