Are there other instances available? X can't ban them all. I wish legal issues wouldn’t exist for this project and X would stop attacking projects that provide information for free. Privacy is important more than ever as many of us don't want to login into X.
XCancel service is suspended until further notice
101–110 of 726 posts
Re: XCancel service is suspended until further notice
#102Web version of Twitter has become unusable now. So much so that I wonder why they still keep it.
Re: XCancel service is suspended until further notice
#103Are there other instances available? X can't ban them all. I wish legal issues wouldn’t exist for this project and X would stop attacking projects that provide information for free. Privacy is important more than ever as many of us don't want to login into X.
Re: XCancel service is suspended until further notice
#104Maybe instead of trying to get rid of services that provide a more convenient access to X to non-logged-in users, they should realize that there is a real market behind these services - users that will likely never sign up to X, but who want to read/watch some content without the incessant nagging and limitations that X subjects non-logged-in users to?
Re: XCancel service is suspended until further notice
#105Re: XCancel service is suspended until further notice
#106Web version of Twitter has become unusable now. So much so that I wonder why they still keep it.
Re: XCancel service is suspended until further notice
#107Of more concern, the Nitter github repository was permanently archived a couple of days ago. https://github.com/zedeus/nitter
Why do you say it’s permanent? Unarchiving a GitHub repository is reversible, and just as easy as archiving it.
Re: XCancel service is suspended until further notice
#108Of more concern, the Nitter github repository was permanently archived a couple of days ago. https://github.com/zedeus/nitter
Re: XCancel service is suspended until further notice
#109Re: XCancel service is suspended until further notice
#110Maybe instead of trying to get rid of services that provide a more convenient access to X to non-logged-in users, they should realize that there is a real market behind these services - users that will likely never sign up to X, but who want to read/watch some content without the incessant nagging and limitations that X subjects non-logged-in users to?
It's like paywalls. Some news companies share free news as a sort of loss leader. Others say, "if you aren't going to pay we simply don't want you here."