11–20 of 29 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's perhaps the most pernicious Claudism. Or just the one that gets my goat the most. Saying what something isn't, usually twice, before saying what it is. What a fucking waste of words.
Got it. No bullshit, no ceremony: just straight to the point.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's perhaps the most pernicious Claudism. Or just the one that gets my goat the most. Saying what something isn't, usually twice, before saying what it is. What a fucking waste of words.
Got it. No bullshit, no ceremony: just straight to the point.
I say to the guy, “That looks load-bearing.”
He looks at me like I just insulted his mother. “What the hell does that even mean?”
This is the same guy who asked me to rebuild Twitter. No bugs. By Friday.
"No systemd. No sshd. No cron. No logging daemon." You can delete that sentence. Why would someone assume sshd or cron in an environment like this? Omit needless words.
It's perhaps the most pernicious Claudism. Or just the one that gets my goat the most. Saying what something isn't, usually twice, before saying what it is. What a fucking waste of words.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's perhaps the most pernicious Claudism. Or just the one that gets my goat the most. Saying what something isn't, usually twice, before saying what it is. What a fucking waste of words.
I'm not defending claudeslop, but TBF, anaphora and its lesser-known sibling: epistrophe far predate the English language, let alone something new like LLMs.
The type of repetition Claude uses is what Fowler[1] called "elegant variations" and discouraged in modern style guides for a good reason - people find it really annoying.
[1] Henry not Martin
"No systemd. No sshd. No cron. No logging daemon." You can delete that sentence. Why would someone assume sshd or cron in an environment like this? Omit needless words.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's perhaps the most pernicious Claudism. Or just the one that gets my goat the most. Saying what something isn't, usually twice, before saying what it is. What a fucking waste of words.
I'm not defending claudeslop, but TBF, anaphora and its lesser-known sibling: epistrophe far predate the English language, let alone something new like LLMs.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's perhaps the most pernicious Claudism. Or just the one that gets my goat the most. Saying what something isn't, usually twice, before saying what it is. What a fucking waste of words.
I'm not defending claudeslop, but TBF, anaphora and its lesser-known sibling: epistrophe far predate the English language, let alone something new like LLMs.
"No systemd. No sshd. No cron. No logging daemon." You can delete that sentence. Why would someone assume sshd or cron in an environment like this? Omit needless words.
It's perhaps the most pernicious Claudism. Or just the one that gets my goat the most. Saying what something isn't, usually twice, before saying what it is. What a fucking waste of words.
One thing that I didn't understand from this article was how you use this deployment platform. Can you tell Claude code for web to build and deploy a web app using it? If so, does that end up with a public URL somewhere? Does that deployment continue working after your Claude code for web session ends?