Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
That's an artifact of it not using A-Z as it's alphabet. What you type gets translated before the AI sees it. The seventeen word the AI sees does only contain three 'e' s.
Fable 5.1 Solves the Cyphral Distich, a 370-year-old cipher
31–40 of 571 posts
Re: Fable 5.1 Solves the Cyphral Distich, a 370-year-old cipher
#32A very neat problem and result. I often find myself swinging between "It's so over" and "We're so back" - some days I roll out of bed thinking I could have Claude solve some random unproven OEIS sequence before breakfast; other days, I wake up in a cold sweat worried about the fate of humanity and what the world might look like in a decade. I think it's that I don't have a very high p(doom) or p(utopia), and I don't…
I've done something similar to your formal garden map. It's work that no professional historian would ever do because the data entry would be such a slog for a relatively small reward. GPT reduced the task from "infeasible" to "annoying", and once I had the data transcribed I learned a few things, so I walked away happy. Whatever happens commercially, these models have been a real boon to hobby projects. > I told it…
I have not seen this in other models.
Re: Fable 5.1 Solves the Cyphral Distich, a 370-year-old cipher
#33A very neat problem and result. I often find myself swinging between "It's so over" and "We're so back" - some days I roll out of bed thinking I could have Claude solve some random unproven OEIS sequence before breakfast; other days, I wake up in a cold sweat worried about the fate of humanity and what the world might look like in a decade. I think it's that I don't have a very high p(doom) or p(utopia), and I don't…
Re: Fable 5.1 Solves the Cyphral Distich, a 370-year-old cipher
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
That's an artifact of it not using A-Z as it's alphabet. What you type gets translated before the AI sees it. The seventeen word the AI sees does only contain three 'e' s.
Re: Fable 5.1 Solves the Cyphral Distich, a 370-year-old cipher
#35Re: Fable 5.1 Solves the Cyphral Distich, a 370-year-old cipher
#36I wonder how many of the recent results are due to the fact that very few looked at the problem to start with. Still great results, but the general impression is that it's more about the so many low-hanging fruits than the actual capability.
Re: Fable 5.1 Solves the Cyphral Distich, a 370-year-old cipher
#37It is cool. But how do we know that nobody solved that problem before and it was somewhere in the training data? some blog, or some book or whatever?
They published this on 31 aug and nobody in that community cared and no news covered how this 300+ years mystery was solved?
Re: Fable 5.1 Solves the Cyphral Distich, a 370-year-old cipher
#38Re: Fable 5.1 Solves the Cyphral Distich, a 370-year-old cipher
#39The successor to Klaus's blog is Satoshi Tomokiyo's Cryptiana site, so a month ago I asked Opus 5 to scrape it all, rank them and have a go at solving some. It didn't get the ranking right. But I knew the Civil War Stager ciphers were ripe for solving, so I had it do those https://cryptiana.blogspot.com/2026/09/route-transposition-c...
The art of solving historical unsolved ciphers is knowing what is on the boundary of solvability. Since this site attracts so many OpenAI and Anthropic employees, I'll mention one that was featured by both Klaus and Satoshi in 2023, presumably Spanish transposition, which should be on that boundary but has resisted all attempts at solution https://cryptiana.blogspot.com/2023/09/a-telegram-from-switz...
Re: Fable 5.1 Solves the Cyphral Distich, a 370-year-old cipher
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is this going to be the cope every time this happens?
Haha - I'm just seriously wondering, how can anyone tell at this point?