Live data from Hacker News

JetKVM Mini

jetkvm.com

91–100 of 243 posts

Re: JetKVM Mini

#91
post #35

I am amazed that there is an ESP that can handle this and with just 32MB of RAM: https://docs.espressif.com/projects/esp-dev-kits/en/latest/e...

The only reason it had been difficult was video capture and compression. Even 32MB would be overkill if you didn't need remote screen.

....that's kinda the feature KVM is for, remote screen

Re: JetKVM Mini

#93
post #26

It is really hard to find on the site what kvm stands for. Guess people going there knows what it stands for but think it could be spelled out once at least.

Just click the “docs” button at the top and the concept is explained in the first paragraph.

Re: JetKVM Mini

#94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Warning: Don't browse their documentation site, it's filled with domain-specific jargon like FPS, BIOS, LAN, HDMI and other things, and not a single one is explained first! They should clearly read "Product Websites for Dummies" again.

Actually yes, why not? All the professional documentation has glossary in it, btw.

If you click the “docs” button on this page the definition of KVM and the purpose of the product explained immediately.

Re: JetKVM Mini

#95
post #14

or make one yourself: https://github.com/espkvm/espkvm

Maintainer (espkvm) here. :) Thanks for the mention ;)

It started as a firmware for myself: I wanted a KVM, but not a Linux system inside one. A colleague talked me into publishing it and it grew from there. It runs on ESP32-P4 dev boards, no custom hardware.

I am not saying it is better than JetKVM. What I find more interesting is that the Mini landed on the same chip. Their stack is completely different from the Linux JetKVM, so it must be a rewrite from scratch - a sign the idea of a KVM without an OS holds up.

Re: JetKVM Mini

#96
post #85

I have 4 of the old ones in service and they're great. Whenever I need to remotely reboot a server those come in handy just great, no more fear of what I'm going to do if the server doesn't come back online. It also solved the issue I had with entering a password on FDE (full disk encryption) systems. Previously I had to rely on a janky solution with booting into BusyBox so that the system can be accessed remotely an…

I like jetkvm a lot but the splitter with the dual USB-c’s is really, really finicky and will say it’s not connected for seemingly no reason. They don’t even send you all the cables you need (which I’m sorry, but jetkvm team if you’re reading this, that’s ridiculous) so you’re just kind of rotating through your pile until you find one that it arbitrarily accepts. Power in particular just refuses to work with many cables for some odd reason. Kind of annoying, I would rather just pay the extra cost and have all the exact cables I need out the box.

At least the new ones dropped the splitter and put 2 separate ports it seems.

Re: JetKVM Mini

#97
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was actually thinking the exact opposite. The big “tail” on the original gives you something to build an enclosure around, and the ports are all on the face opposite the display. That shape makes it easy to 3d print a mount for a 10” rack. This one has stuff on four out of six surfaces (display, button, card slot, ports), and the two free surfaces are at a right angle to each other instead of being on opposite side…

I was thinking the point was it was so light to have it hanging on the cables themselves, as I'm certain absolutely no one does in any of their installations...

But then why bother with having a display at all?

Re: JetKVM Mini

#99
I have an OG JetKVM and it works solidly but the thing that prevents me from using it is no video pass through. The awkwardness of an ‘invisible’ monitor connected to windows at all times is hard to live with - windows and apps open there and I’m constantly having to pull them back to an another monitor. My next KVM will be pass through for this reason, but the consumer ones seem to top out at 4k30, which is not great either.
Post reply on HN