Live data from Hacker News

Psychoactive substances helped spur Andean civilization

science.org

151–153 of 153 posts

Re: Psychoactive substances helped spur Andean civilization

#151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Alcohol requires an astronomical intake compared to most drugs, and I'd say the indiscriminate action and lack of any particular affinity is what makes it a poison as opposed to a drug. It is also generally assumed that alcohol is not exactly in the same category as drugs. ("drugs or alcohol" etc.)

"drugs or alcohol" I usually encounter this framing from alcohol drinkers who are trying to be self-righteously judgemental about users of other drugs without getting hit by their own boomerang, so seeing it used for what is essentially the opposite opinion (i.e., that alcohol is worse than other drugs) is quite refreshing. I still disagree with it, though. Alcohol is clearly a drug.

Yep, alcohol is one of a very small number of recreational drugs that can kill addicted people who quit cold turkey. Even hospitals have to provide ethanol to heavy drinkers to prevent withdrawal.

Re: Psychoactive substances helped spur Andean civilization

#152
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How are these traits inherited by descendants who don’t consume drugs that increase the plasticity of their brain themselves?

This is from the intellectual con artist Terence McKenna. McKenna never let things like this get in the way of his theory. There was a flaw in the math of his ridiculous Time Wave Zero idea that when pointed out to him, didn't change anything. I was super into McKenna as a dumb teenager. I even had the dos program of Time Wave Zero. The idea McKenna would be taken seriously on anything after December 21, 2012 is real…

You'll get more buy in on your ideas if you didn't present them so bitterly. Your comment seems like you were let down after getting highly attached to the theory.

Re: Psychoactive substances helped spur Andean civilization

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If Crack was legal today would you light up a pipe ? Maybe right after filing your taxes ? The most dangerous part of any illegal substance is the illegal economy existing to support it. Drug dealers generally can’t sue each other so they resolve disputes via other means. Law Enforcement has the right to suspend all your so called rights because someone you may or may not know might have an unauthorized substance. Se…

> If Crack was legal today would you light up a pipe ? I wouldn’t but I don’t drink either, while many ppl drink themselves to incapacitation. The difference between crack and a bottle o’ Jack though is that consequence of a crack-filled weekend isn’t just a hangover. Maybe a society with all drugs legal would eventually figure out tolerable dosages for heavy recreational crack use (I really did write this ha), but d…

You mean a society that doesn’t give millions of people criminal records for what’s ultimately a health issue ?

Probation still doesn’t work. You don’t have a whole lot of bootleggers now do you ?

Regulate, tax, educate.

Post reply on HN