Live data from Hacker News

Room 641A

en.wikipedia.org

61–70 of 79 posts

Re: Room 641A

#61
post #26

Covered many times before. How Mark Klein told the EFF about Room 641A [book excerpt] ( https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/the-whistleblower-who-unc... ) 710 points | the-mitr | 4 months ago | 254 comments Room 641A ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A ) 333 points | hourislate | 6 years ago | 70 comments Room 641A ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A ) 248 points | llambda | 13 years ago | 44 comments Room…

Good. I hope it gets covered many times in the future as well, and that we never forget that the moment we stop fighting tooth and nail to protect our privacy is the exact moment it goes away.

it has been gone lmao.

Re: Room 641A

#62
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good. I hope it gets covered many times in the future as well, and that we never forget that the moment we stop fighting tooth and nail to protect our privacy is the exact moment it goes away.

it has been gone lmao.

Defeatist totally wrong attitude. People are fighting back against flock and winning for example.

Signal reached 100 M MAU.

GrapheneOS has reached 500k estimated users.

Privacy is more of an issue today than ever before with more people caring about it.

Fisa 702 expired.

Cell network area searches determined to require a warrant by supreme court.

https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/02/17/privacy-is...

Re: Room 641A

#63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> No, they never made that argument because they don't grab and store all packets. Instead, they stored the metadata extracted from these packets (the sender and receiver). This program has ended prior to Snowden's leaks according to his documents, but the telephone pen register collection was still ongoing. The utah data center is their buffer. And they were storing large amounts of traffic because they had their di…

> The utah data center is their buffer. The Utah data center hadn't even been constructed at the time of Snowden's leaks, so obviously there was no evidence for that in the leaks. > And they were storing large amounts of traffic because they had their diffie-helman hack. Again, there was no evidence that they were doing this in the leaks. The leaks said that they did full take data collection only in a specific set o…

Please, just stop.

The engineers I've talked to did not misread the leaks and found non public information confirming it. The diffie-hellman stuff has explicit evidence in the leaks. Yes, the Utah data center is newer than the leaks. It was created because total traffic was expanding and they required more storage.

Re: Room 641A

#64
post #11

These days they call it Cloudflare and make you pay for it lol

You'll be happy to know that Cloudflare's headquarters is about three blocks away from the very room that this thread is about.

Re: Room 641A

#65
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

it has been gone lmao.

Defeatist totally wrong attitude. People are fighting back against flock and winning for example. Signal reached 100 M MAU. GrapheneOS has reached 500k estimated users. Privacy is more of an issue today than ever before with more people caring about it. Fisa 702 expired. Cell network area searches determined to require a warrant by supreme court. https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/02/17/privacy-is...

How are people winning against mass surveillance cameras?

There are a few fewer Flock cameras... because municipalities are switching to Axon and Motorola.

Re: Room 641A

#66
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not about language, it's about culture. If you saw someone running through a crowd with a knife you'd expect them to be thrown in prison. But someone speeding through a neighborhood? Or dangerously overtaking a cyclist? No bother. If the person running with the knife hurt someone they'd be a murderer. But the car? Oh, it was just an accident .

You think they were doing it on purpose every time someone is in an accident, or you think every time someone says "accident", they're referring to or you're purposely missing the nuance to make a point nobody agrees with, or you think that people in general are not annoyed when someone drives recklessly? If it's the first, I dunno - you're wrong. People aren't. If it's the second, aside from insurance fraud, nobody…

Are they plane crashes or plane accidents? (Replace "(air)plane" with "car".)

Re: Room 641A

#67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The utah data center is their buffer. The Utah data center hadn't even been constructed at the time of Snowden's leaks, so obviously there was no evidence for that in the leaks. > And they were storing large amounts of traffic because they had their diffie-helman hack. Again, there was no evidence that they were doing this in the leaks. The leaks said that they did full take data collection only in a specific set o…

Please, just stop. The engineers I've talked to did not misread the leaks and found non public information confirming it. The diffie-hellman stuff has explicit evidence in the leaks. Yes, the Utah data center is newer than the leaks. It was created because total traffic was expanding and they required more storage.

> Please, just stop.

I will stop correcting you when you stop posting falsehoods. The conspiracy theories that people spread following the Snowden leaks that were contradicted by the leaks themselves helped lead to a the government we have today, so this is not some minor issue that I will let rest.

> The diffie-hellman stuff has explicit evidence in the leaks.

Nothing in the leaks says they were exploiting a Diffie-Helman weakness. That was hypothesized years after the leaks. I didn't address this because it was irrelevant compared to the larger lie that they "grab and store all packets" in the US instead of in some small set of regions with little Internet traffic and extreme national security interest as said in the leaks.

> It was created because total traffic was expanding and they required more storage.

Again, not because they were storing full take US data. That is not in the leaks.

Re: Room 641A

#68
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Defeatist totally wrong attitude. People are fighting back against flock and winning for example. Signal reached 100 M MAU. GrapheneOS has reached 500k estimated users. Privacy is more of an issue today than ever before with more people caring about it. Fisa 702 expired. Cell network area searches determined to require a warrant by supreme court. https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/02/17/privacy-is...

How are people winning against mass surveillance cameras? There are a few fewer Flock cameras... because municipalities are switching to Axon and Motorola.

https://deflock.org/council#:~:text=City%20Council%20Meeting...

153 victories listed here. Do you think it's impossible to make our society more focused on privacy? Why be defeatist? Many things seemed terrible like womens or black people's rights in America but they fought and got their rights.

You are supporting the surveillance state if you propose giving up because privacy is already dead.

Re: Room 641A

#69
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not about language, it's about culture. If you saw someone running through a crowd with a knife you'd expect them to be thrown in prison. But someone speeding through a neighborhood? Or dangerously overtaking a cyclist? No bother. If the person running with the knife hurt someone they'd be a murderer. But the car? Oh, it was just an accident .

You think they were doing it on purpose every time someone is in an accident, or you think every time someone says "accident", they're referring to or you're purposely missing the nuance to make a point nobody agrees with, or you think that people in general are not annoyed when someone drives recklessly? If it's the first, I dunno - you're wrong. People aren't. If it's the second, aside from insurance fraud, nobody…

There is a strong push in many sectors to stop using the word accident, so your assertion that this is a point no one agrees with is false.

Re: Room 641A

#70
post #69
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You think they were doing it on purpose every time someone is in an accident, or you think every time someone says "accident", they're referring to or you're purposely missing the nuance to make a point nobody agrees with, or you think that people in general are not annoyed when someone drives recklessly? If it's the first, I dunno - you're wrong. People aren't. If it's the second, aside from insurance fraud, nobody…

There is a strong push in many sectors to stop using the word accident, so your assertion that this is a point no one agrees with is false.

Oh, you think I was being literal
Post reply on HN