I've been using DuckDuckGo for years now, ever since it became noticeable that two different people searching for the same search term would get two different results back from Google. Meaning they were no longer completely reliable: they might show one person a result that they hide from the other person by burying it on page 3 where few people ever look. DDG's search results have been poorer recently than they used…
Speaking of page 3, Google's been asking me to sign in if I try to go beyond page 2 of search results. What a wonderful modern WWW we live in.
google.com/goto: Google's anti-scraping update
121–130 of 545 posts
Re: google.com/goto: Google's anti-scraping update
#122Re: google.com/goto: Google's anti-scraping update
#123Google have such a (justified) bad reputation that whatever they do, people assume it’s entishification. I don’t believed it is on that matter.
Re: google.com/goto: Google's anti-scraping update
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
But what’s stopping Google from doing this already?
JavaScript being disabled - Google was already sending analytics pings when search result links were clicked on, using JS.
Re: google.com/goto: Google's anti-scraping update
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
but you can click the link and reveal the information. what is being hidden? from who?
Like the OP says, it's being hidden form scrapers. Like you I don't see a reason for normal users to be concerned.
Re: google.com/goto: Google's anti-scraping update
#126Re: google.com/goto: Google's anti-scraping update
#127Re: google.com/goto: Google's anti-scraping update
#128Re: google.com/goto: Google's anti-scraping update
#129Most people i see using ChatGPT for any search related work in everyday life. Maybe Google is observing this?
Yeah seems pretty obvious to me that most people are not going to be using a search engine in 5 years. In the sense of searching for something and combing through the results to find the answer.