161–170 of 612 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
There’s quite a gap between pirating content (even en masse) and hacking prominent entities.
No. Not legally. Has it been normalized? That's another thing.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also, why there's no accountability? Even if there's no intent, it's still a cyber attack.
It’s interesting that a lot of U.S. law requires intent. If you just give AI your objective without specifying the means, and the AI violates a bunch of laws requiring intent, but neither the AI nor the person can be prosecuted, this is very convenient.
Do drunk drivers intionally kill people on the road?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also, why there's no accountability? Even if there's no intent, it's still a cyber attack.
No harm, no foul. Dog owners are on the hook for damages resulting from their dogs, but there must be some damage in the first place. If the dog gets loose and goes in your fenced backyard, disregarding your "no trespassing" sign, you can't punish the dog owner just because. Hacking into a server is closer to the latter. At best rubygems can claim some cleanup costs.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also, why there's no accountability? Even if there's no intent, it's still a cyber attack.
We have a word for attack with no intent. It's accident.
And we have a word for an accident caused by people that failed to implement proper risk mitigation, were not paying attention, and should have known better. It’s negligence.
Disgusting that they are, unintentionally but incredibly irresponsibly, actively vandalizing cyberspace with impunity.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also, why there's no accountability? Even if there's no intent, it's still a cyber attack.
It’s interesting that a lot of U.S. law requires intent. If you just give AI your objective without specifying the means, and the AI violates a bunch of laws requiring intent, but neither the AI nor the person can be prosecuted, this is very convenient.
we might get something if they tried to cover it up.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If any remediation was required, that's damage. This looks a lot smaller than the HuggingFace hack but it still required some cleanup.
Remediation mostly involved repairing pre-exising holes in the fences that the dog crawled through.
So tens of thousands of developers running agents, subagents as we speak, whats the chances...