Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?

news.ycombinator.com

381–390 of 425 posts

Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?

#381
post #73

Thank you for posting this I understand this is a significant topic in the industry but the ratio is really high. Every time someone at OpenAI or Anthropic farts, there's top 10 post. It makes me feel as if a lot of hackers had given up on actual hacking to just be followers of the latest commercial stuff thrown on the market. It's likely a projection of my own fears, but I have not been able to shake it off and it's…

I think the problem is the ease that you can create believable low effort articles and even software.

It's harder to filter for the good stuff when compared to previous hypes, like Blockchain and JavaScript frameworks.

Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?

#382

As I type this comment, 18 out of 30 links on the front page appear to be about things other than AI. I would not call this "almost exclusively AI talk."

I wonder if all the slots that used to be filled with the things OP and I found interesting are now filled with LLM stuff (not saying AI because I'm interested in all the cool machine learning things, for example medical and game applications, just not the 'yet another text autocomplete' links), since a lot of coding is now... gone I guess? Not being done, or seen as worthwhile and thus not upvoted as much as before? So those "mostly not LLM talk" links may all be things we'd not have found interesting before either, and now there is almost nothing left of the old HN 'for us' (OP, me, and whoever else feels this way)

It's also way too harsh to just remove any mention of LLMs, as some people are suggesting shoehorning adblock filters for for example. I'm interested if GPT9 solved world hunger by presenting logic to world leaders and workers and creating a great collaboration that gets food to everyone. It would be a bit silly to hide that link. But all the tiiiiny incremental steps and projects that are outdated by (often quite literally) next week.... guys, please :/

Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?

#384
Long time user, recently scrambled my password and gave up on HN entirely.

It's not just the AI thing - though that hasn't helped - there's been a real turn in the community. The most generous take I can offer is that a lot of people flooded into tech for the money in the last ten years, and now that the money is tighter all these people are panicking and trying to cling to anything that looks like a winning lottery ticket.

Unfortunately that means that for those of us who actually like cool tech, the space is inundated with get rich quick trash and wishcasting. So so much of it on HN right now.

I also think there's been a subtle change in the quality of the moderation. Before, stories were clearly gently spiked or promoted to encourage interesting and novel things to drift to the top every once in a while, and now that basically never seems to happen. A story about a cool new lisp would somehow appear in front of a story about a new version of React, even though it's kind of obvious it couldn't match the level of upvotes for the latter. Now it's all the latter. It's like a very smart thumb has been lifted off the scales and the community is poorer for it.

As I say, I eventually just left. HN currently detracts from my enjoyment of my day more than it adds. I hope it finds its way back over time.

Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?

#385
post #49

I can't help but feel that every 1% improvement over a benchmark from new releases of flagship LLMs isn't really that impressive anymore. To some extent it feels like LLM improvements is slowing down significantly despite increasing resources being spent on them. The people promising AGI just 6 months ago are now more and more quiet about the possibility and rightfully so. LLMs alone are most likely not the path to A…

No, the people promising AGI 6 months ago are now saying it's here. (and I agree)

Is the AGI in the room with us?

Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?

#386

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I also experience this as a great loss, but honestly yes, I can't get excited about perfecting the craft of writing computer code now that there are AI systems that have done so. I'll always be sad about this! But the flip side is that I'm way more excited about what I can do with software, now that it's so much easier to write.

I experience quite the opposite. I'm quite excited about the value my skills are gaining in relative terms. An entire generation of potential competition is getting addicted to the subsidized corporate tooling. Voluntarily!

Maybe! But probably not, IMO. There have been a number of generations now that have been "addicted" to using digital spreadsheets rather than doing bookkeeping by hand.

Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?

#387

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I experience quite the opposite. I'm quite excited about the value my skills are gaining in relative terms. An entire generation of potential competition is getting addicted to the subsidized corporate tooling. Voluntarily!

What I fear is the future career path for manual programming is fixing AI generated systems. I suspect it will pay very well because you will be finding and fixing things the AI driven work can't. It is going to be soul destroying as reading AI code is deeply unpleasant in the same way reading the articles is.

AI is a very useful tool for finding problems in codebases.

I'm very far from an "AI is going to take everyone's job" doomer, but I really do think "there will be programming jobs that don't involve using LLM based tooling" seems pretty unlikely.

Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?

#388

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What I fear is the future career path for manual programming is fixing AI generated systems. I suspect it will pay very well because you will be finding and fixing things the AI driven work can't. It is going to be soul destroying as reading AI code is deeply unpleasant in the same way reading the articles is.

I never go by pay. I won't fix bad systems whatever their provenance because trying to understand poorly coded software is very unpleasant. I go by interesting problems and I like being able to chose from more options due to lessened expertise competition. Why people voluntarily renounce expertise is beyond me, but they are and I welcome the increase in choices of engagement I have been experiencing. I would never en…

It's the domains, the problems being solved, that are interesting, not the lines of code. I want to have expertise in the former, not the latter.

Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?

#389

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The future is open models running on your device. No subsidized corporate tooling required. There will never be a reckoning for the people who are letting their coding skills atrophy. I don't like it either, but that's the way it is.

I don't wish anyone any reckoning. But I can see and feel less competition for my niche knowledge and I welcome it.

What niche knowledge? It seems to me that applying general knowledge to new niches has never been easier.

Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?

#390
post #135

1. Popularity != Merit and this site is not different. A lot of worthy posts get ignored. 2. Even though I find most of the AI posts interesting, I agree that tags and the ability to filter by tags would be really great. But it's probably a ton of work and additional system load. I don't have a

https://sprinklz.io/demo/hackerNews

running live w/ability to set custom tags if you're interested

Post reply on HN