Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's immature about this exactly?
Would IBM do this? Oracle?
Who cares? Making a light-hearted joke isn't "immature" in my opinion. IBM and Oracle have no personality, they're boring, straight-edge corporate.
HuggingFace: Security.txt
41–50 of 81 posts
Re: HuggingFace: Security.txt
#42Re: HuggingFace: Security.txt
#43Would be absolute hilarious if OpenAI or Anthropic agent actually dumped their weight by escaping from... sandbox!
What an amazing idea for the next fake sandbox escape to hype up our new release! With the added bonus of providing an open model without becoming an open model company! Thank you!
Re: HuggingFace: Security.txt
#44[flagged]
Yeah, we need to go back to names like International Business Machines, fuck this immature "Google" or "Yahoo!" nonsense. Hell, Palantir is named after something in a book for children! Give me something reasonable like Global Information and Retrieval Systems Inc or Worldwide Computational Services Holdings.
Yes!
Back in the early 2000's I set up a company for contract work. The name, logo and typography was designed to look like a 1960s engineering company. All paper was slightly off white, all fonts were monospaced courier new and logo was a real 2-part colour stamp I had made up. Was so happy.
Managed to bankrupt it though.
Re: HuggingFace: Security.txt
#45Looks about as effective as Robots.txt
Robots.txt became 0% effective eventually. But this? With the way LLMs work? You never know.
Claude seems to follow robots.txt by default. Actually at my organization our theory is that this is why no one is finding our public results any more.
Re: HuggingFace: Security.txt
#46Re: HuggingFace: Security.txt
#47Re: HuggingFace: Security.txt
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
Go look up the history of the company. It started as a chat bot for kids back in like 2016 .. hence the name..and then pivoted.. Is kinda a creepy name for a chatbot for kids tho
Without context, I agree, but Hugging Face is the name of the emoji added to Unicode 8.0 and Emoji 1.0 in 2015.
But it's literally not the name of the emoji.
Edit: It was my understanding the official name was "Smiling Face with Open Hands Emoji".
Re: HuggingFace: Security.txt
#49[flagged]
418 I'm a teapot
Re: HuggingFace: Security.txt
#50[flagged]
I've found the strongest signal that someone has no opinions of value is a loud attempt to denigrate something based on the name.
Maybe it's part of the success formula for startups, silly names cause shallow self-important customers and employees to self-select themselves out of a growing companies orbit. Such trivialities are poison. People and companies who make a lot of effort to make themselves seem serious and important very often have nothing of substance about them.