Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?

news.ycombinator.com

361–370 of 425 posts

Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?

#361
post #338

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But HN simply ranks posts by upvotes. I know you don't intend it this way, but you're effectively suggesting that HN should not pay attention to what its userbase are upvoting, but instead curate posts by your personal opinion instead. That's ... probably not going to be a workable solution for anyone other than you, I'm sorry. There are always a lot of HN top stories that I'm not interested in, but I just scroll pas…

> But HN simply ranks posts by upvotes. As others pointed out: a) HN absolutely does apply weighs to some topics b) bots

And to prove this point: this post went from page 1 to page 4 in a matter of hour, despite significant voteship. Posts are not ordered per count only, there's an algorithm and manually applied weighs involved.

Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?

#362

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have the same "1/30th ... simultaneous" experience with coding agents, and I am having fun. Directing teams of agents to solve many problems (or create many useful things) for me has its own fun challenges/puzzles-to-solve. Some of the fun is redirecting coding agents when they get stuck, by showing them code or design they could not work out on their own. Some of the fun is designing tools to rein-in AI coding age…

Sure, if that is what you like. I for one did not get into this field because I wanted to hire people (artificial or natural) to write the programs for me. Programming as an activity / art is what I enjoyed the most. Managing people / agents is a total turn off.

But I am creating programs to manage the coding agents for me. Of course I am using coding agents to do that. It's turtles all the way down :-)

Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?

#363

It has been like this for more than a year, a lot longer than just the past couple of months. HackerNews, just like all other platforms, is heavily astroturfed and the big AI labs have bots commenting and voting, so it'll never end. The only solution is a platform that only allows humans, with a proof of humanity before posting anything, but not too sure what that can be, and it would ultimately be unsuccessful. But…

[dead]

Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?

#365

Time for a category at the top? Next to new, jobs, ...? Something like "sans AI". I like adjacent articles though. Today https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49656496 was a delight. It would be sad if such articles were filtered out or automatically downvoted or similar.

> Something like "sans AI"

Sounds like something that'll shrink to an insignificant niche over time, rendering it meaningless as a category.

Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?

#366

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've always been interested in "building". Programming was always just the means to do so. I got into it at a very young age, but the syntax and the languages were just the means to an end of building and creating. I'm academically interested in algorithms and data structures and distributed systems architectures, but I have no desire to actually code those things by hand. You're probably not hand-writing your softwa…

AI is not an abstraction and it cannot be the foundation for the next layer up, like assembly can. I think you are categorically wrong.

Maybe there is no next layer. This is it, and it'll just be iterated on for decades.

Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?

#367

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They're all on the front page, just buried between all the AI stuff

Its important to use these filtered front pages though, so that eventually theres a sizable Referrer traffic chunk coming not from HN's frontpage itself that will signal to the admins that something is up

No disrespect intended at all, I like HN and have used it for what feels like a long time and the moderation team that keeps it one of the more reasonable places to have a conversation on the internet (for the most part).

That out of the way, The admin/moderators can hardly be unware given they work for a startup accelerator that is heavily in on the AI stuff, it is the way it is because that is the way they want it to be.

HN is great but it's bias has always skewed to what is hot in the VC market or that they are heavily in on at the time (as someone who was around when it seemed like every other post was blockchain/crypto it's not even "new").

Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?

#368
I've been using HackerSmacker for a while to tag AI-related and non-AI-related submissions.

I find, depending on the time of day, 30-50% of submissions are about AI. Also, Users who submit AI-related content tend to also submit non-AI-related content - those I tag for non-AI-related content almost never submit AI-related content.

Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?

#369

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Its important to use these filtered front pages though, so that eventually theres a sizable Referrer traffic chunk coming not from HN's frontpage itself that will signal to the admins that something is up

No disrespect intended at all, I like HN and have used it for what feels like a long time and the moderation team that keeps it one of the more reasonable places to have a conversation on the internet (for the most part). That out of the way, The admin/moderators can hardly be unware given they work for a startup accelerator that is heavily in on the AI stuff , it is the way it is because that is the way they want it…

oh absolutely, but if they lose half their audience due to the sloppification of their front page, then they lose both legitimacy as an interesting and impartial platform to promote said AI tech
Post reply on HN