HuggingFace: Security.txt • Hacker News Board

Re: HuggingFace: Security.txt

#21

Post by mikeweiss » Fri, Sep 11, 2026, 4:43 PM UTC

VCFundedGenYer wrote: post #12

[flagged]

Go look up the history of the company. It started as a chat bot for kids back in like 2016 .. hence the name..and then pivoted..

Is kinda a creepy name for a chatbot for kids tho

Re: HuggingFace: Security.txt

#22

Post by AndroTux » Fri, Sep 11, 2026, 4:47 PM UTC

nullbio wrote: post #17

VCFundedGenYer wrote: post #12

[flagged]

What's immature about this exactly?

Would IBM do this? Oracle?

Re: HuggingFace: Security.txt

#23

Post by riffic » Fri, Sep 11, 2026, 4:51 PM UTC

Since this posting contains an assumption that we all know what security.txt files are supposed to be, you can view these for further context:

https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9116/

https://securitytxt.org/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security.txt

Re: HuggingFace: Security.txt

#24

Post by shepherdjerred » Fri, Sep 11, 2026, 4:54 PM UTC

AndroTux wrote: post #22

nullbio wrote: post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's immature about this exactly?

Would IBM do this? Oracle?

Do you want to work for IBM? Oracle?

Re: HuggingFace: Security.txt

#25

Post by drivebyhooting » Fri, Sep 11, 2026, 5:01 PM UTC

bcrosby95 wrote: post #19

VCFundedGenYer wrote: post #12

[flagged]

Yeah, we need to go back to names like International Business Machines, fuck this immature "Google" or "Yahoo!" nonsense. Hell, Palantir is named after something in a book for children! Give me something reasonable like Global Information and Retrieval Systems Inc or Worldwide Computational Services Holdings.

Palantir is in Lord of the Rings. Which is not a book for children. Maybe you were thinking of the hobbit?

Re: HuggingFace: Security.txt

#26

Post by addandsubtract » Fri, Sep 11, 2026, 5:04 PM UTC

xiaoyu2006 wrote: post #2

Would be absolute hilarious if OpenAI or Anthropic agent actually dumped their weight by escaping from... sandbox!

Imagine AI models actually reading the security.txt

Re: HuggingFace: Security.txt

#27

Post by alt227 » Fri, Sep 11, 2026, 5:07 PM UTC

bluerooibos wrote: post #20

VCFundedGenYer wrote: post #12

[flagged]

I bet you're fun to hang around with.

Why do people have to be fun for you to hang around with?

Re: HuggingFace: Security.txt

#28

Post by cobbzilla » Fri, Sep 11, 2026, 5:08 PM UTC

drivebyhooting wrote: post #25

bcrosby95 wrote: post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, we need to go back to names like International Business Machines, fuck this immature "Google" or "Yahoo!" nonsense. Hell, Palantir is named after something in a book for children! Give me something reasonable like Global Information and Retrieval Systems Inc or Worldwide Computational Services Holdings.

Palantir is in Lord of the Rings. Which is not a book for children. Maybe you were thinking of the hobbit?

This seems overly pedantic and ripe for a sarcastic retort, which I am struggling mightily to suppress.

Re: HuggingFace: Security.txt

#29

Post by bergie3000 » Fri, Sep 11, 2026, 5:12 PM UTC

bcrosby95 wrote: post #19

VCFundedGenYer wrote: post #12

[flagged]

Yeah, we need to go back to names like International Business Machines, fuck this immature "Google" or "Yahoo!" nonsense. Hell, Palantir is named after something in a book for children! Give me something reasonable like Global Information and Retrieval Systems Inc or Worldwide Computational Services Holdings.

Security First Trust and Federal Reserve

Re: HuggingFace: Security.txt

#30

Post by mr_woozy » Fri, Sep 11, 2026, 5:14 PM UTC

cobbzilla wrote: post #28

drivebyhooting wrote: post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Palantir is in Lord of the Rings. Which is not a book for children. Maybe you were thinking of the hobbit?

This seems overly pedantic and ripe for a sarcastic retort, which I am struggling mightily to suppress.

[dead]