Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?
301–310 of 425 posts
Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?
#302I maintain a simple browser extension to auto-hide AI news stories: https://github.com/ColdPie1/enough-ai-on-hn/ It just scans for keywords and clicks the Hide button. Doesn't catch everything, but cuts out a ton of the noise. You can go hit the Hidden page in your profile sometimes and scan for highly-upvoted stories to see the couple that are maybe actually worth looking at.
That solves it for the individual, but still leaves gullible people exposed to the shock and awe indoctrination and ads run by the AI astroturfers. If every sane person used this extension, there would be no pushback.
Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?
#303Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's also https://unslop.news , which removes just the posts about AI, rather than all posts that mention it at all
"92 of 179 articles survived the filter". So about half of the posts are about AI now, more than I expected.
Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?
#304Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well it is the best way to do a 'fuzzy' filter like that. Rather than trying frantically to chase keywords. I don't think anyone considers AI to be something useless. It sure has its uses, I use it a lot to help with research. But it is sometimes shoehorned into things it doesn't belong, or its capabilities overblown for marketing. I think that's what people object to.
That and the sheer volume drowns out everything else. The S/N ratio entirely depends on whether you care about AI and I don't not really.
Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?
#305A tagging feature would be nice, but HN is historically very reluctant to introduce new features. I argue that’s a good thing, given its age and the fact that it remains the gold standard for tech community news.
Adding tagging strikes me as a tall order, almost like asking Craigslist to make a major UI change - feature additions threaten the spirit of a beloved platform.
Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?
#306news.ycombinator.com##:matches-path(/^\/(?:news)?$/) tr.athing:has(a:has-text(/AI|claude|A.I|harnesses|harness|OpenRouter|llm|vibecode|agi|deep learning|agent|TPU|GPT|DeepSeek|Anthropic/i)):xpath(. | following-sibling::tr[1]) I just have that in my Ublock Origin rules - it cuts the noise dramatically and if something gets through I just update the has(), it's a brute force approach. Ironically the only reason I saw t…
Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?
#307Instead, AI deserves its own field, outside (and, in my taste, far away from) CS.
Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?
#308Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Do we live in a parallel universe? I mean it, this week was crazy from a progress point of view. This is how I feel too, wandering into some of these threads. Sure the damn things aren't perfect yet, but people act as if they are incapable of doing anything, or no more worth the hype than Bootstrap?? (the latter comes from this very thread!)
When Anthropic gave out some usage, I was able to do a lot more and it felt differently than when you always have to think about limits. I now spend $90 this month and do even more now (privat). It might really be a big bias of these people either not spending any time on it or just doing very small experiments and immediadly being put of by some random issue.