Earlier quoted context omitted.
> big AI labs have bots commenting and voting I'd love to see some proof of this.
Turn on showdead and watch the AI bros yell into the void.
Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?
131–140 of 425 posts
Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?
#132Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?
#133I noticed it as well but I don’t see a problem with it. I have spot-checked it at times and saw 5 to 8 of the top 10 posts about AI or directly adjacent. We are in an emergent, dynamic periodt. AI is revolutionary and will continue to get better. The world will change drastically because of it. This seems so obvious yet many will call it purely hype, no real value, etc. We are still in the incubation period, just lik…
> I noticed it as well but I don’t see a problem with it. Again, I don't have a problem with AI news, I have a problem with missing out on other news that simply don't surface the news from the "New" abyss.
Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?
#134I'd also SERIOUSLY ask for an "LLM generated" flag in addition to normal flags - on both comments and submissions, that is. Obvious slop comments thankfully already get flagged or downvoted in the hell they belong, but the submissions, oh dear god I do not wish to engage with shit written by AI any more. It's questionable enough if you let LLMs do your coding work for you, but if you can't even be arsed to write a pr…
Unfortunately most of what gets posted to HN or could conceivably be posted here is already LLM generated to some degree. Because content of interest to HN tends to be written by the same people who increasingly prefer to use an LLM for everything they do, machine-generated submissions are only going to increase over time. Tagging submissions as LLM generated is ultimately futile, as one might as well tag water as we…
Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?
#1352. Even though I find most of the AI posts interesting, I agree that tags and the ability to filter by tags would be really great. But it's probably a ton of work and additional system load.
I don't have a
Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?
#136https://studyfinds.com/telling-kids-theyre-smart-nearly-doub...
Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?
#137There is an ebb and flow. But with Hugging Face hack, and Navier–Stokes. You're going to be flooded with news for at least a few more weeks.
Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm curious where people would go to as an alternative. I like looking at lobste.rs for non-AI stuff, but to post there you need to be invited by an existing member so it's not a perfect alternative.
The fediverse. Mastodon or Lemmy are viable alternatives if you curate well enough.
Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?
#139Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are the Lenovo and Braxx examples I provided not relevant nor current?
Lenovo is just vaporware currently as was their laptop with translucent display. YMMV but I no longer waste my time with things that are not available (and may never be). The Lenovo page that is linked from the page you posted is super light on details and just fluffy marketing. Doing some research on "AirJet solid-state cooling" turns up products that have been announced at CES 2023. More info may be found at the Fr…
> so the Airjet thing (for me) is pretty much a solution in search of a problem.
That's it? Fan is about noise and nothing else? The much lower volume/dissipation and weight/dissipation ratios, which made this Lenovo latop 830g, which easily allows for some 200-300g of extra battery is a solution in search of a problem?
Sorry, if you don't see this then we have nothing to discuss.
Re: Ask HN: Can we please limit the AI news flood?
#140At least the frontpage is no longer filled with Ruby and Ruby on Rails projects anymore :) These things tend to improve/get worse by themselves over time, if it's not AI, it'll be something else, until the industry moves on. Right now, seems we're still "discovering" new things around AI, so the submissions will surely continue, and interested parties will continue to upvote. But AI will have its eventually Ruby/RoR…
The Erlang front page was nice, though: https://news.ycombinator.com/front?day=2009-03-11