Earlier quoted context omitted.
With respect, I think the distinction is irrelevant to the actual point. Whether the definitions are accurate enough means little to the actual problem, which is that we are rushing towards creating extremely powerful tools. Recorded (and arguably unrecorded) history seems to demonstrate the same pattern: inevitably, any tool will be put to use towards violence. I would argue that yes, it’s a tool and humans are the…
No, we mostly stopped using chemical weapons because they were bad at modern warfare : https://acoup.blog/2020/03/20/collections-why-dont-we-use-ch...
Gambling with our lives: AI researcher quits Anthropic with warning about safety
111–111 of 111 posts