Live data from Hacker News

iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max

apple.com

461–470 of 486 posts

Re: iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max

#461

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It would be great if they could use the LiDAR scanner to sign a depth map of the scene in front of the camera. It would show if you photographed a flat image.

The sensor already uses phase detection autofocus. You can create a depth map out of it. iPhone X used its dual cameras and that phase data for depth maps.

How? Is this for every image taken, or does one need to take a second photo? Or is it "in theory phase detection hardware would let you make a depth map"

Re: iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max

#462

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agree with the weakness, but the benefit of provenance is still there. You can't tell if the picture that person took is of an AI image, but there's some value in saying "I took this" and being able to prove it.

How does this actually work though? 1) I see a photo online and doubt it's provenance 2) I contact the photographer and ask to see their cloud image (???!) 2a) I borrow someone's mac to download the image (.jpg?) and it can be verified on that?

Ideally it’d be linked to public key on a DNS txt record or similar, and trustworthy clients (including social media apps) show the domain linked to the photo.

Re: iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max

#463
post #387

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The 'ol "analog hole". Never been able to patch that gap.

Yes, if your adversary can generate a high-fidelity 3D moving replica of a scene, they can deceive you that it’s real. But can they really?

Images that are meant to be 2d (E.g. a photo of something on paper) isn't going to look 3d. I guess this approach will just have to let anything flat through?

Re: iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max

#464

Still on a 12 Pro Max, which I bought near the original launch. It is in need of its first replacement battery. I’m very curious to see how much snappier it feels with this next iOS release which is focused a bunch on performance; in addition to a new battery, since I believe my iOS is throttling performance given the health.

I still have my 11. The battery is garbage on it, but everything is still totally fine. Haven't upgraded to iOS 26 though...

11 Pro Max. First battery needs replacement but it's ok on iOS 27. I don't need or want a new phone.

Re: iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max

#465

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, it might help that on day 1, I turned off the liquid glass effects in accessibility settings. At first there were several small layout / UI bugs that came from turning liquid glass off. But it seems fine now. I don't use the apple podcasts or music apps. (Overcast and Spotify for me). I haven't run into any serious problems.

I'm not sure if you're an iphone user or did you root your iphone? It's NOT possible to turn LG off in iOS 26. It is possible to reduce transparency and motion (i tried with and without enabling those and it's broken anyway).

Oh my mistake. I just reduced transparency and motion. I’m not surprised that some things are still broken. Liquid Glass seems like a promotion ticket someone cashed at the expense of all iPhone users.

Re: iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max

#466

I would love to see some "pro" features hit the Pro or Pro Max. Something I've wanted for a while is the ability to have more than 2 active eSIMs; I think a dual modem would be really cool, maybe with some features targeting users in poor cell coverage/ spotty service areas. Or feature Thunderbolt rather than normie USB-C so you can record 4/8K ProRes to an SSD, and power a multi monitor setup with your iPhone Pro. m…

> I think a dual modem would be really cool, maybe with some features targeting users in poor cell coverage/ spotty service areas. Can already do iMessage over satellite. Most “data” is download and I predict some satellite service that sends basic broadcasts (traffic, news, Text-to-speech podcasts) squeezed into a few mbps by pointing your phone at the sky (or a small cabled antenna for around the clock use). Would…

Long ago there was a Usenet over satellite feed: http://www.art.net/lile/pagesat/netnews.html

Re: iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max

#467

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The sensor already uses phase detection autofocus. You can create a depth map out of it. iPhone X used its dual cameras and that phase data for depth maps.

How? Is this for every image taken, or does one need to take a second photo? Or is it "in theory phase detection hardware would let you make a depth map"

The sensor has special pixels which can detect phase differences in incoming light. Camera uses these pixels (aka embedded detectors on the image sensor) to be able to focus where you want. This is same from phones to professional cameras.

(DSLR cameras have independent phase detection arrays. This is why the mirror has a small mirror behind. To illuminate that section).

Lenses are tuned. They know how distant the thing they are focusing on, also photos' EXIF generally carries the focus point information. Side note: Apple Aperture used to be able to show where you focused with that info. Still no app does this. I'm still mad that we don't have Aperture anymore. Anyway...

So, if you collect this phasing information alongside the photo which you're taking, you are capturing the depth map of the photo. Its resolution will be lower, but not lower enough to be useless.

For example, Sony (and most probably all other big camera manufacturers) cameras use this phasing data throughout sensor in real-time for following moving subjects to keep the focus on them by predicting where they are going.

So, there's no "in theory". The phasing data is the depth map. Otherwise your camera can't focus on anything. It's there to focus, and it's done by reading the phasing data and knowing where to go by how much.

All fast AF systems are PDAF. When light is too low, then it's CDAF, which does way slower, without using any phase/depth data.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autofocus#Phase_detection

Edit: Meaning clarified, bugs squashed, mirrors polished.

Re: iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max

#468
post #455
post #448

The 17 is 969 euros. The 18 Pro is 1479 euros. How can I justify the difference? I'm on 13 now and I wanted to get an 18 but since there is no such thing I will probably end up with the 17.

I'm still on a 12 pro. Was considering the 17 a couple months back, decided to wait for the 18 and now I'm in the same boat as you. The 18 just doesn't really seem worth the huge difference...

I've decided; just ordered the 17

Re: iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max

#469

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>I doubt any phone battery is lasting 5+ years. Just coming up to five years on mine and it is still at 87% capacity.

That is genuinely shocking to hear. You have to be like 3+ sd above the mean. Do you know how many charge cycles you have? I recall that most batteries need replacing after 300-500 cycles.

I don't know but I am very careful not to run it flat and I don't use a fast charger with it. It does get used daily though (more than I would like).

Re: iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max

#470
post #27

> eSIM-only models deliver up to 36 hours of video playback on iPhone 18 Pro and up to 45 hours of video playback on iPhone 18 Pro Max. That might convince me to upgrade. Not because I care about watching video for two days straight, but hopefully it means the battery is large enough that it'll last 5+ years before battery degradation becomes annoying.

You'll just get used to charging it once every few days, and charging it once a day will seem annoying once it degrades.
Post reply on HN