Earlier quoted context omitted.
You base this off what? We really live in a post truth society where innocent asks for evidence supporting a claim are discouraged. I am not saying it stolen, merely asking if there is any proof it was bought. And no, “oCcAms rAZOr” is not evidence.
This comment and others like it are wild to me. Since when was the default to assume malicious activity and victimization, and then to ask for proof otherwise? Obviously we should do the reverse. There should be evidence of theft rather than assuming theft as the baseline. For starters, if the band's handles were taken non-consensually, then the least we should expect is a public complaint from said band. This is dou…
Rock band Muse lose social media handles to Meta’s new AI tool
41–50 of 112 posts
Re: Rock band Muse lose social media handles to Meta’s new AI tool
#42> The exact circumstances surrounding the changes aren't clear. The exact circumstances are that they likely paid them a shitload of money.
I'd love to get paid a ton of money to leave their social shitwork for good. Do they have mastodon or bluesky?
Re: Rock band Muse lose social media handles to Meta’s new AI tool
#43> The exact circumstances surrounding the changes aren't clear. The exact circumstances are that they likely paid them a shitload of money.
Re: Rock band Muse lose social media handles to Meta’s new AI tool
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
This comment and others like it are wild to me. Since when was the default to assume malicious activity and victimization, and then to ask for proof otherwise? Obviously we should do the reverse. There should be evidence of theft rather than assuming theft as the baseline. For starters, if the band's handles were taken non-consensually, then the least we should expect is a public complaint from said band. This is dou…
When a company is known for being malicious by default, to the point of knowingly covering up their ongoing and extensive contributions to teen suicides, it is not unreasonable for people to expect they would steal social media accounts to suit their interests. They are pure unadulterated evil. They are guilty until proven innocent at this point.
The fact that one hates XYZ is not a good reason to turn one's brain off and lose the ability to think rationally about XYZ.
In fact, I would argue that there's never a good reason to turn one's brain off and lose the ability to think even moderately intelligently.
Re: Rock band Muse lose social media handles to Meta’s new AI tool
#45Re: Rock band Muse lose social media handles to Meta’s new AI tool
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
You base this off what? We really live in a post truth society where innocent asks for evidence supporting a claim are discouraged. I am not saying it stolen, merely asking if there is any proof it was bought. And no, “oCcAms rAZOr” is not evidence.
Well in a decent society you can't take things that aren't yours. Nobody using Muse the tool knows or gives a fuck who Muse the band is, the band itself is twice their age. At 32 years a band is reaching Spinal Tap stage and they could probably use the cash. Occam's razor and all that.
Re: Rock band Muse lose social media handles to Meta’s new AI tool
#47I never heard of muse the band. I never heard of meta's muse either.
Re: Rock band Muse lose social media handles to Meta’s new AI tool
#48> The exact circumstances surrounding the changes aren't clear. The exact circumstances are that they likely paid them a shitload of money.
You base this off what? We really live in a post truth society where innocent asks for evidence supporting a claim are discouraged. I am not saying it stolen, merely asking if there is any proof it was bought. And no, “oCcAms rAZOr” is not evidence.
Re: Rock band Muse lose social media handles to Meta’s new AI tool
#49Wild so many creators are pouring their life’s work into these platforms instead of their personal website