Live data from Hacker News

I Don't Want to Interact with Stochastic Parrots

ploum.net

1–10 of 64 posts

Re: I Don't Want to Interact with Stochastic Parrots

#4
post #2

HN now has AI/LLM-enabled comment processing. Even if you don’t want to interact with the machine it will interact with you. You will eat ze bugs and you will be happy.

> Don't post generated text or AI-edited text. HN is for conversation between humans.

This is HN's newest guideline / rule, seems the opposite to me. Does it still happen, yes, is it as bad as 6 months ago, no.

Re: I Don't Want to Interact with Stochastic Parrots

#7
post #4
post #2

HN now has AI/LLM-enabled comment processing. Even if you don’t want to interact with the machine it will interact with you. You will eat ze bugs and you will be happy.

> Don't post generated text or AI-edited text. HN is for conversation between humans. This is HN's newest guideline / rule, seems the opposite to me. Does it still happen, yes, is it as bad as 6 months ago, no.

The most human thing is posting something that breaks the rules.

Re: I Don't Want to Interact with Stochastic Parrots

#9
post #3
post #2

HN now has AI/LLM-enabled comment processing. Even if you don’t want to interact with the machine it will interact with you. You will eat ze bugs and you will be happy.

What do you mean by this?

It's a reference to a very old meme. Where "eat the bugs" was a shorthand for the lower classes being fed bugs as a cheap source of protein. Has been re-mixed without attribution so many times that I don't know when it started, even Snowpiercer got in on it back in 2013. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_jK9O4tEiA

I think here it's meant to imply that LLMs will be forced on the population at large as a form of social control.

Re: I Don't Want to Interact with Stochastic Parrots

#10
I'm very sorry to say it, but even reading LLM-slop is less tiresome, then reading yet another anti-AI slop article. It's a pretty low bar.

I could find 10 anti-AI posts on HN and they all will contain points from a very narrow pool of anti-AI takes. I mean, how many more times do you need to repeat them?

> stochastic algorithms trained to produce tons of "average," non-human content

As we can see, humans are also quite capable of producing "average" content. And by "average" I don't mean "average quality", I mean "average opinion of a certain group".

Post reply on HN