It's all marketing. Don't fall for it, it's the age old strategy "our product is extremely dangerous, so fear us". Like the tobacco companies saying all the time "our cigarettes are so dangerous, they cause cancer". Or like Purdue Pharma saying "do not use fentanyl, it's so dangerous, it kills thousands of people every year". They try to generate fear in their products, to shock investors into buying their stock.
Anthropic researcher says more than 10% chance AI "could kill all humans"
21–30 of 111 posts
Re: Anthropic researcher says more than 10% chance AI "could kill all humans"
#22It's all marketing. Don't fall for it, it's the age old strategy "our product is extremely dangerous, so fear us". Like the tobacco companies saying all the time "our cigarettes are so dangerous, they cause cancer". Or like Purdue Pharma saying "do not use fentanyl, it's so dangerous, it kills thousands of people every year". They try to generate fear in their products, to shock investors into buying their stock.
Re: Anthropic researcher says more than 10% chance AI "could kill all humans"
#23This is the most perverse marketing campaign in history. "Our product might wipe out all of human civilization". It is said that heavily regulated industries earn that regulation. Seems like the LLM folks really want that regulation.
Re: Anthropic researcher says more than 10% chance AI "could kill all humans"
#24I’ve yet to see a rational argument for how we go from super intelligent LLMs to human extinction or extermination. I understand that some smart people are worried about it. I just haven’t come across a believable or understandable argument.
Re: Anthropic researcher says more than 10% chance AI "could kill all humans"
#25If they actually believed this they'd be buying a truckload of fertilizer and diving it to the nearest chip fab. I don't buy it.
Re: Anthropic researcher says more than 10% chance AI "could kill all humans"
#26I’ve yet to see a rational argument for how we go from super intelligent LLMs to human extinction or extermination. I understand that some smart people are worried about it. I just haven’t come across a believable or understandable argument.
Re: Anthropic researcher says more than 10% chance AI "could kill all humans"
#27I’ve yet to see a rational argument for how we go from super intelligent LLMs to human extinction or extermination. I understand that some smart people are worried about it. I just haven’t come across a believable or understandable argument.
Re: Anthropic researcher says more than 10% chance AI "could kill all humans"
#28It's all marketing. Don't fall for it, it's the age old strategy "our product is extremely dangerous, so fear us". Like the tobacco companies saying all the time "our cigarettes are so dangerous, they cause cancer". Or like Purdue Pharma saying "do not use fentanyl, it's so dangerous, it kills thousands of people every year". They try to generate fear in their products, to shock investors into buying their stock.
Posts here with no activity can't climb gravity without engagement.
Re: Anthropic researcher says more than 10% chance AI "could kill all humans"
#29Re: Anthropic researcher says more than 10% chance AI "could kill all humans"
#30Probably for the best. Humanity had a good run, but this is no longer our civilization. Your best course of action is to start ripping the copper out of the walls.
Why the doomerism? In general humanity is living its best life compared to nearly every other step in time.
People are losing jobs left and right due to AI and as models get intelligent it'll get tougher (even for AI devouts. Because if AI can do 10 ppls job then jobs will be decimated)