Including them?
Anthropic researcher says more than 10% chance AI "could kill all humans"
11–20 of 114 posts
Re: Anthropic researcher says more than 10% chance AI "could kill all humans"
#12If they actually believed this they'd be buying a truckload of fertilizer and diving it to the nearest chip fab. I don't buy it.
Why would you need to bomb a chip fab because you think AI might lead to people getting killed in the future? I'm convinced of many things killing humans, yet I don't have any desire to bomb or kill others, I think this is pretty common, but who knows....
Re: Anthropic researcher says more than 10% chance AI "could kill all humans"
#13I understand that some smart people are worried about it. I just haven’t come across a believable or understandable argument.
Re: Anthropic researcher says more than 10% chance AI "could kill all humans"
#14It's all marketing. Don't fall for it, it's the age old strategy "our product is extremely dangerous, so fear us". Like the tobacco companies saying all the time "our cigarettes are so dangerous, they cause cancer". Or like Purdue Pharma saying "do not use fentanyl, it's so dangerous, it kills thousands of people every year". They try to generate fear in their products, to shock investors into buying their stock.
Re: Anthropic researcher says more than 10% chance AI "could kill all humans"
#15If they actually believed this they'd be buying a truckload of fertilizer and diving it to the nearest chip fab. I don't buy it.
Re: Anthropic researcher says more than 10% chance AI "could kill all humans"
#16Re: Anthropic researcher says more than 10% chance AI "could kill all humans"
#17Re: Anthropic researcher says more than 10% chance AI "could kill all humans"
#18Re: Anthropic researcher says more than 10% chance AI "could kill all humans"
#19This is the most perverse marketing campaign in history. "Our product might wipe out all of human civilization". It is said that heavily regulated industries earn that regulation. Seems like the LLM folks really want that regulation.