Live data from Hacker News

Getting your hands dirty is good for you

bbc.com

221–230 of 230 posts

Re: Getting your hands dirty is good for you

#221

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can get parasites from animal faeces too.

From being barefoot? I think it’s pretty low on the risk list. There is absolutely an animal hookworm but it does not have the some risk as human hookworm. Sure if you eat the poop in your backyard you might get something so that is always important to think about!

Plenty of people have a backyard garden...

Re: Getting your hands dirty is good for you

#222

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I made the mistake of looking at /r/sauna on Reddit once or twice recently, and there was a lot of people doing very similar things. "I take my preworkout, do my exercise, then I sit for 12 minutes at 90 degrees in sauna, before three minutes in the cold plunge-pool at 8 degrees, before going to sauna again for 19 minutes and I finish with a seven minute warm shower". Just the thought of looking at a watch in a sauna…

> Just the thought of looking at a watch in a sauna You don't take your watch into the sauna! It's way too hot! I use a plain mechanical kitchen timer (outside the sauna). I've seen hourglasses that are designed to withstand the heat inside the sauna, but they're obviously not configurable to various increments. More seriously: apparently studies show that using a Finnish (dry) sauna 5-7 times a week is good for long…

Or people who can withstand saunas naturally love longer? Maybe even despite them?

Re: Getting your hands dirty is good for you

#223

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But also, hookworm infections are known to suppress allergies and asthma, help inflammatory bowl disease, and improve insulin resistance in people with type 2 diabetes.

Just because your immune system is fighting for your life against a parasite and doesn't have time for side quests doesn't make contracting a parasite good for you

I believe the theory is the exact opposite. A hookworm calms the host's immune system.

Re: Getting your hands dirty is good for you

#224

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Given that you know these terms you must be aware we have invented different words for organisms that have mixed effects (positive and negative) on the host organism. Parasite, commensalist and symbiote. If you don't want folks who know these words to argue with you you should not use the wrong ones.

Feel free to find an example of scientific literature referring to hookworms as either commensalist or symbiot in humans.

Feel free to explain how the labels change the facts. Examples of beneficial effects have already been cited from "scientific literature".

The argument was only to point out that just because labels are black & white doesn't mean life is black & white, and treating a label as reality is stupid.

No one went so far as to say "everyone should go get hookworm". That would also be a stupid thing to say, and more to the point: a stupid thing to think anyone was saying.

Re: Getting your hands dirty is good for you

#225
post #214

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One could simply use ballet shoes, instead of that overpriced stuff. They come in different styles, colors, materials, are foldable(ususally), and can be considered disposable.

It still squeezes your toes into a narrow toe box, which is pretty much the opposite of barefoot shoes.

Well how else are you expected to do en pointe whilst grounding oneself?

Re: Getting your hands dirty is good for you

#226

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From being barefoot? I think it’s pretty low on the risk list. There is absolutely an animal hookworm but it does not have the some risk as human hookworm. Sure if you eat the poop in your backyard you might get something so that is always important to think about!

Plenty of people have a backyard garden...

I am still missing the point sorry. Infection risk from parasites is quite low via ingestion and even lower via skin. It’s quite low of a risk for ground vegetables and it’s why you want to rinse everything off to begin with. Non-zero but highly unlikely. Some eggs can last years but again washing your produce off is important.

Re: Getting your hands dirty is good for you

#227
post #216
post #211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Honestly that sounds horrible. In most of the civilized modern world that problem is solved tho and people pick up after their dogs

Sadly most dog owners only pick up after their dog if someone else is around/watching. Most people on rural neighborhoods won't pick it up at all. https://archive.is/lcEzs

Sad to here. I lively in a quiet remote place in the mountains and I usually only find fox shit, or occasional cat shit if anything. People here in Switzerland do usually care. And I got the same impression from _most_ our neighbour countries.

Re: Getting your hands dirty is good for you

#228
post #219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Getting a light tan feels amazing. Your whole body feels warmer. You know what feels even better? Not getting skin cancer. > Vitamin D Easily obtained from supplements.

One could also add positive mental health effects, and benefits of morning sunlight for maintaining a healthy circadian rhythm. Sure, you can always come back that you can take anti-depressants, and try to use some sort of sun-mimicking light, but then we're really going to extremes to avoid the sun altogether. So is exposure to the sun, at the right times, in moderation, with appropriate but not extreme protection o…

> So is exposure to the sun, at the right times, in moderation, with appropriate but not extreme protection okay?

Depends on your personal risk tolerance. For majority of people, probably yes: the benefits (especially the mental ones) would outweight the small risks.

Re: Getting your hands dirty is good for you

#229
post #216
post #211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Honestly that sounds horrible. In most of the civilized modern world that problem is solved tho and people pick up after their dogs

Sadly most dog owners only pick up after their dog if someone else is around/watching. Most people on rural neighborhoods won't pick it up at all. https://archive.is/lcEzs

I walk my dog twice a day every day rain or shine. I've picked up his poop 100% of the time - as do most other members of my suburban community. Our parks and sidewalks are mostly dog poop free.

Having said that, I've observed four cases where dog poop is more likely left behind.

1. Small dogs - owners of small dogs seem far more likely to leave dog poop behind. Perhaps because they think the poop is itself small?

2. Older owners (often owners of small dogs, but not always) - seem to care less.

3. Off leash dogs in parks - will often poop at the far edges of parks while their owners chat. Edges of parks and near bushes are minefields.

4. Rainy days - people just want to get home, clean off their dog and be done. So they seem more likely leave poop behind.

Re: Getting your hands dirty is good for you

#230
post #211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I live in a city and I cannot tell you how often I see dogshit on the sidewalk, like just in the middle of the sidewalk the only neighborhoods where I don't see this are the ones where there's some nice retired older person who diligently cleans the shit up. but it's not like they bleach the spot, they just pick up most of the poop. so yeah, there's feces everywhere it also doesn't help that we have bottom tier publi…

Honestly that sounds horrible. In most of the civilized modern world that problem is solved tho and people pick up after their dogs

it's not a person issue, it's a systems problem in the same way that desire paths reflect bad design. regular garbage receptacles maintained by the city with poop bags would solve this issue but there's not one for miles in my neighborhood. similarly, human waste would be similarly reduced if there were more public restrooms that are maintained as part of the public good

problem is that it requires municipalities and counties to take ownership and they don't give a shit and thus we get the shit we deserve

Post reply on HN