Wow. Imagine OpenAI/Google/Anthropic doing this! Nope.
DeepSeek launching v4.1 flash cheaper and more capable than v4 pro
11–20 of 214 posts
Re: DeepSeek launching v4.1 flash cheaper and more capable than v4 pro
#12Re: DeepSeek launching v4.1 flash cheaper and more capable than v4 pro
#13Re: DeepSeek launching v4.1 flash cheaper and more capable than v4 pro
#14v4 pro was decent then a better cheaper faster model comes now? As a consumer I feel like hansel and gretel combined, deepseek could be the witch.
Re: DeepSeek launching v4.1 flash cheaper and more capable than v4 pro
#15Re: DeepSeek launching v4.1 flash cheaper and more capable than v4 pro
#16For all intents and purposes, "low" is pretty much the same as turning reasoning off, and "high" is similar to "max". "High/max" performs way too much reasoning, takes forever, and causes costs to balloon. They need a proper "medium" setting.
I get it that they're probably focused on pushing performance right now, but the ergonomics of the model aren't great.
Re: DeepSeek launching v4.1 flash cheaper and more capable than v4 pro
#17v4 pro was decent then a better cheaper faster model comes now? As a consumer I feel like hansel and gretel combined, deepseek could be the witch.
Re: DeepSeek launching v4.1 flash cheaper and more capable than v4 pro
#18Hopefully it will be open weights and have the same architecture and size as the current v4 flash vision, which is probably the best LLM that can be run on 128G devices.
Interesting, I had assumed it'd be too large to fit. What quant and context size are you running?
I'm making my own quants, though the Vision-Exp version is outdated and won't work on llama.cpp master branch (I built it before llama added support):
- https://huggingface.co/tarruda/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-GGUF
- https://huggingface.co/tarruda/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp-...
For the Vision-exp version, I also ran perplexity + KLD against the original MXFP4. Seems quite OK: https://huggingface.co/tarruda/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp-...
Re: DeepSeek launching v4.1 flash cheaper and more capable than v4 pro
#19Since a few months, I almost exclusively use the Chinese "flash" models for my needs. They are a joy and they cost pennies per answer. Great job.
I don't need a model that can invent new mathematics. I need something that is fast, cheap, and consistent. Give me that and I can build and scale.
Re: DeepSeek launching v4.1 flash cheaper and more capable than v4 pro
#20But, the web ui chat version of flash has very poor language following abilities in my experience:
You may ask it something in English, and get a thinking chain in Chinese with an answer in Chinese, or an English thinking chain and an English answer. Using the retry button on the same question has a 50/50 chance of any of those results.
Sometimes, asking something in English, but where information are mostly in another language may make the answer in the language where data has been found. The other day, I asked something about a local German thing, in English, and I got an answer in German instead. It’s as if all the language data stirred it away from the language of the user’s question.