Live data from Hacker News

Initial effects of AI technology on employment look positive

economist.com

161–164 of 164 posts

Re: Initial effects of AI technology on employment look positive

#161
post #160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don’t know if those companies are doing it for the right reasons but I’ve implemented a policy of showing me that you can do the job manually as well. The reason being that if you can’t then you probably can’t tell when the AI is wrong. My company is strictly Cybersecurity/IR though so that may vary with other specialties.

If the interview was specifically about doing it manually that’s one thing. I called them schizophrenic because the companies I’ve interviewed with seem like they desperately want to be on the AI bandwagon and want you to demonstrate the ability to effectively use AI, but they don’t currently know how to evaluate that and panic and default back to their old heuristics. It is very difficult in 45-50 minutes to complet…

Oh yeah no that’s just a terrible interview process.

I think schizophrenic is a great way to describe that.

Re: Initial effects of AI technology on employment look positive

#162
post #107
post #104

No they are not, try to change jobs and if you can't or takes a really long time you know this is some of the finest baloney. And no, it's not creating a lot of jobs, one one of the kind that will be destroyed by AI no, and that's the point... you built something that removes the pricey laywer, software developer, insurance policy writer, designer, etc... and replace it with a ONE TIME go work under the sun with no a…

AI has completely broken interviewing as well. The asks I am getting in the few interviews I can achieve are schizophrenic. They have pretty uniformly wanted me to demonstrate using AI but then freak out and interrogate me for every prompt and then want me to demonstrate I can do the task by hand. And that’s only after getting through the AI run filtering that gives a different score everytime your unchanged resume i…

It was always better to find job via recommendations. Both for companies and candidates. Old leetcode style interviews were no better at identifying good candidates for given job.

Re: Initial effects of AI technology on employment look positive

#163
post #113
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Building and maintaining data centers aren’t minimum wage jobs. They are the best kind of jobs: accessible to somewhat above average people across a broad range of backgrounds. (As opposed to upper middle class knowledge worker jobs that are only accessible to the cognitive top 10%.)

I think we are kidding ourselves if we think writing software was only accessible to the cognitive top 10%. And even if that were the case for the highly paid software jobs, there was a long tail of WordPress customization type jobs that required less experience and will probably be going away.

[deleted]

Re: Initial effects of AI technology on employment look positive

#164
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When AI gets that good, a solar panel can power a pile of motors and gears to move and do work for you that previously required humans. You won't need the job, you need to solve your necessities more directly. And that job is a good fit for the AI that was so good it put you out of a job.

So... robots build shit that the wealthy who own the robots can profit from it and I need to ... what? ... go grow my own potatoes if I want to live? Okay...

Own your robot, it will cost less than a car.
Post reply on HN