Live data from Hacker News

Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

ai.meta.com

291–300 of 702 posts

Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

#291
Shouldn't it be a WhatsApp contact? Just like a bot but with extra powers. Why a separate app?

I may/not download it but if it was a WhatsApp Assistant it would already be installed in a billion devices, just like Siri

I know it's not 'just a bot', it's an agent, assistant, whatever, but it's code and can be included in some other code with the same capabilities as if stand-alone

Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

#292
post #247

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> you should really question your worldview a bit. Yeah, I still struggle with it. I have a diverse friend circle and sometimes I forget that most of them don't have the same information diet that I do (or don't even care about tech the way I do). Maybe I should be more like them and just chill? I don't know.

You don't have to "be like" anyone but yourself. You should, however, be aware of what you know and more importantly what you do not know.

And be aware of unknown unknowns existance even if not specifics, helps uncover them

Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

#293
post #284
post #247

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> you should really question your worldview a bit. Yeah, I still struggle with it. I have a diverse friend circle and sometimes I forget that most of them don't have the same information diet that I do (or don't even care about tech the way I do). Maybe I should be more like them and just chill? I don't know.

Tech is a rather minor part of the world of knowledge. How many languages do you know? Do you know the styles of Renaissance painters? Slept with super-model? Ever seen an elephant stampede? Meditated by the Ganges? Read thousands of stories? Climbed a mountain so high you need Oxygen? Tech stuff is so boring.

> Slept with super-model

What's the knowledge supposedly required to attain this on your mind?

Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

#294
I think the product as shown in this marketing material with these examples falls squarely in the “nobody asked for this” territory of AI.

At least with B2B AI there is a problem to be solved: reduce my labor costs and increase my business output.

What’s happened here is that consumer technology is already solved, but companies like Meta are trying to jam AI technology into something that solves the non-problems that supposedly exist in hopes of squeezing the last drops of profit out of the space.

It’s hard for me to say if this problem is with the product itself or the examples that feel like an executive’s out of touch guesstimate of what it must be like to be a working class peasant consumer. What do the poor do again…book movie tickets? Is that like making a dinner reservation at a Michelin star restaurant? I bet they’ll need an AI assistant for that!

Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

#295
post #234

I think Meta's strategy is to capture the 'normie-tier' of AI users. I know most of us here on HN track model releases quite frequently and discuss every parameter weight out of them, but most of the world is just... oblivious? I was discussing latest in tech with an accounting friend out of curiosity, and I kept talking about tiers of GPT-5.6 (Sol vs Terra vs Luna) and asked which one she used on the desktop 'Work'…

They are not 'normies' - we're just 'nerds'.

You're driving a home kit car, they're driving something out of the factory.

Eventually - we'll probably drive factory variations as well.

Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

#296

Naming your agent is a big deal for personal ownership. I'm surprised it took this long for a company to do this. People hate some company's AI. They love their pets. AI needs to be your pet.

It's good that you don't have to call it "Muse." That's kind of a weird name for a servant; how exactly is this email-parsing bot inspiring works of art? Perhaps it was re-used from another project.

Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

#297
post #267
post #240

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you're right, but I'd add that... if this wasn't obvious to you without being told, you should really question your worldview a bit. A lot of people think that chat.com is an AI called "chat". Most people don't know acronym "LLM". Most people don't know about the existence of companies called "OpenAI" or "Anthropic", or that they are worth a lot of money. Etc.

Even Shingy called chatgpt "chat" when he went on Ed Zitron's show. It was very weird to hear from a guy who has been around tech world for such a long time even if he's non technical.

Even Shingy. Ia he really the standard for explaining tech to normies? Ouch.

Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

#298

The inline browser the agent uses that you can take control of or watch is awesome! This is something I built a lot of tools to do in the past year (including a similar inline UX/image + click pass through) but having it Just Work in a remote, fully managed client for free is extremely convenient and useful. But… this feels like a UX that won’t last once a significant portion of consumers and purchases adopt it. Eith…

[flagged]

Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

#299

Judging from the website, Muse seems to be too keen on making me buy things - Book Tickets, Buy a Stroller. Would this personal AI spam me with ads randomly like this?

having used it for a bit, yes, one of the first things it asked me for, unprompted, were things to set it up to buy stuff. i declined but it still consistently wants to spend money; research a trip? as soon as it has any results it prompts to start booking stuff. etc.

Of course it does! Really, though, what it really wants to do is make restaurant reservations. The primary concern of AI researchers has always been, and will always be, making restaurant reservations.

Parsing natural language and solving climate change are downstream of making restaurant reservations.

Universal Paperclips should have been about making restaurant reservations.

Post reply on HN