If there is one company that I'd never ever use for running a personal agent, that would be Meta. But they have the advantage of a large user base who still uses the platform heavily and a working personal agent is a huge pull for most of their users.
Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent
231–240 of 713 posts
Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent
#232Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent
#233just wait til its got all the sweet sweet meta glasses data that is about to come pouring in.
Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent
#234I think Meta's strategy is to capture the 'normie-tier' of AI users. I know most of us here on HN track model releases quite frequently and discuss every parameter weight out of them, but most of the world is just... oblivious?
I was discussing latest in tech with an accounting friend out of curiosity, and I kept talking about tiers of GPT-5.6 (Sol vs Terra vs Luna) and asked which one she used on the desktop 'Work' app, and she responded with, "just ChatGPT, what is Sol?."
I then realized that most people just stick with whatever default they're provided with, and it's a lot of them. So, us serial HN users and commenters are the extreme minority, and I'm sure millions of people will gobble up this Muse agent from Meta as if it's some sort of an innovative cutting-edge way to use the internet by Meta alone.
Curse of knowledge and all. [0]
Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent
#235Facebook is the first to market with a polished openclaw? Good for them. I'm sure many others will criticize other aspects of Meta, and rightly so. But imagine using a Claw agent with zero tech support available
"This account needs permission to view this page
The account you're signed into doesn't have access to this page. Please log out and follow the steps in your email."
there is no logout or instruction whatsoever on email, so zero tech support definitely not true
Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent
#236"Your personal data is safe and secure" Ahahahahahah no thanks.
Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent
#237[dead]
Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent
#238$META is going in the right direction and it's so underrated.
Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent
#239I have a hard time seeing how Meta is betting people will trust them to serve as their AI agent provider. Based on their track record data privacy and tracking, why would I trust them with my most sensitive data? That’s a hard sell.
Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent
#240I think Meta's strategy is to capture the 'normie-tier' of AI users. I know most of us here on HN track model releases quite frequently and discuss every parameter weight out of them, but most of the world is just... oblivious? I was discussing latest in tech with an accounting friend out of curiosity, and I kept talking about tiers of GPT-5.6 (Sol vs Terra vs Luna) and asked which one she used on the desktop 'Work'…
I think you're right, but I'd add that... if this wasn't obvious to you without being told, you should really question your worldview a bit.
A lot of people think that chat.com is an AI called "chat". Most people don't know acronym "LLM". Most people don't know about the existence of companies called "OpenAI" or "Anthropic", or that they are worth a lot of money. Etc.