Facebook is the first to market with a polished openclaw? Good for them. I'm sure many others will criticize other aspects of Meta, and rightly so. But imagine using a Claw agent with zero tech support available
Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent
221–230 of 727 posts
Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent
#222Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent
#223Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent
#224Facebook is the first to market with a polished openclaw? Good for them. I'm sure many others will criticize other aspects of Meta, and rightly so. But imagine using a Claw agent with zero tech support available
Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent
#225Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent
#226Facebook is the first to market with a polished openclaw? Good for them. I'm sure many others will criticize other aspects of Meta, and rightly so. But imagine using a Claw agent with zero tech support available
This is not even true. Gemini Spark has been there for a while.
Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent
#227Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent
#228Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent
#229> One threat we’re particularly focused on is prompt injection, and we handle it in layers. The model is trained to recognize and resist it. The harness marks anything coming from an untrusted source. Deterministic code checks the result. And an ensemble of classifiers runs where the agent can't reach them.
That "deterministic code" bit makes me wonder if they've implemented ideas from the DeepMind CaMeL paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.18813 - my notes on that paper here: https://simonwillison.net/2025/Apr/11/camel/
Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent
#230They stole my idea. I was working exactly on this! What should I do now?